Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clintonh8r

Whereas the other half of the country was pretty pissed at what he was saying, but then were mollified by the second half of the speech.

At least OUR side is guaranteed a place in the bill. If a bill is passed, that bill will provide border security.

But you won't get that without a comprehensive plan. I disagree that we NEED a comprehensive plan up front, but I DO agree it's the only way to get a bill this year.

Tancredo said he'd rather have NO bill. Smith said he'd rather have NO bill.

I'm willing to bet that a majority of americans will be much happier with a bill that has border security AND the other stuff, than would be happy with no bill at all.

If Clinton had done this, we'd be fighting to get border security ADDED to the bill. It's progress.


2,217 posted on 05/15/2006 8:02:38 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
At least OUR side is guaranteed a place in the bill. If a bill is passed, that bill will provide border security.

How do you know that? The bill might call for some extra money to be spent and some high tech cameras but what will that accomplish?

Money and some high tech toys is not the answer when it comes to securing the border. If it were, then the White House wouldn't have a fence.

2,230 posted on 05/15/2006 8:04:58 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson