Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hate hotline puts speech on hold
Denver Post ^ | 05.13.06 | David Harsanyi

Posted on 05/15/2006 9:56:49 AM PDT by polizoo

There's a famous joke that goes like this:

What's the difference between a Rottweiler and a Jewish mother? Eventually, the Rottweiler lets go.

Now, some Jews may find that joke offensive. I don't. But if you're insulted, and you live in Boulder, you're in luck. Soon enough, you may be able to report me to the authorities.

Tuesday, the Boulder City Council will take up the matter of allocating public funding for a "hate hotline," which would give residents an opportunity to report incidents in which Boulderites use tactless language.

"Our concern - and there are many - is that there is no confidentiality, no legal confidentiality," explains Judd Golden, chairman of the Boulder American Civil Liberties Union, which has not yet taken an official position on the hate-line. "So it's potentially chilling if people think they are providing this information in confidence and then that information were provided to the government or the government sought access to it. That would chill free speech."

Golden says the agenda item on the hotline is "extensive" and a "real dilemma" for the ACLU. There are some very "broad standards" laid out in the resolution.

There is, for instance, the policy statement condemning the usual individual or collective acts of racism and bigotry. Great. But it also condemns those who attack "personal beliefs and values."

"Well, for the ACLU, that goes over the line," Golden says. "You can object to free speech just because someone is a Republican or a Democrat."

What would happen to the bumper- sticker industry?

So, it seems that since purifying our thoughts is still beyond technology's reach, Boulder will now attempt to achieve politically correct speech codes in other ways.

The council should realize, however ugly it may be, Americans still have the constitutional right to be racist, homophobic, Jew-hating or even to make bad jokes - as anyone who's heard the one about the redneck who invented the ejection seat on the helicopter can tell you.

The most serious question, however, is will the hate-line folks forward their files to the Boulder police or City Council?

"The devil's in the details," says Golden. "That's the question. There is no present indication that they intend to do anything like that in

the future." Intention? Sorry, that's not good enough. But that's not even the worst part of it. You could - possibly - rationalize this if it weren't utterly useless.

Phillip Martinez beat up a 22-year-old African-American mechanical-engineering student named Andrew Sterling last year in Boulder. He was sentenced to the maximum of 16 years in prison. The jury wisely decided to drop "ethnic intimidation" charges.

Would a hate-line have helped Sterling? Martinez was from Lafayette, not Boulder. He was drunk. He may not have even cared that Sterling was black.

Should everyone keep the hate-line number on their cellphone speed dial from now on? And remember, only call if your attacker uses racist or insensitive language while beating you to a pulp. After all, according to hate-law advocates, it's not genuine hate unless the perpetrator makes fun of your heritage.

Now, Coloradans don't always consider Boulder a reality-based community. But we all betray a serious lack of confidence in our system of freedoms when we take these sorts of measures.

When that incomparable dope the Rev. Fred Phelps and his hate-mongering brood hit town mocking dead soldiers and gays, we handed them their biggest victory: curbing free speech through legislation to shut them up.

"These things have come up with attempts to criminalize hate speech on campus, those kinds of situations," explains Golden. "Certainly, if it just provides an opportunity to call and have a welcome voice and some kinds of soothing response to their concerns, that would be fine. Speech is good."

Speech is good? Well, not always. But it should generally be free.

David Harsanyi's column appears Monday and Thursday. He can be reached at 303-820-1255 or dharsanyi@denverpost.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aclu; despotism; firstamendment; freespeech; hatecrime; hatecrimes; nannystate; politicallycorrect; speechcodes; thoughtcrime; thoughtcrimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 05/15/2006 9:56:54 AM PDT by polizoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: polizoo

Shoot, I'd be calling that hate line everyday from payphones filling the que with a ton of impolite talk.


2 posted on 05/15/2006 10:00:42 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

I would LOVE to work that line for a day just to hear what the sniveling babies in Boulder are whining about. What a hoot!


3 posted on 05/15/2006 10:03:56 AM PDT by Millee (Tagline free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

Can we report DUmmie postings?


4 posted on 05/15/2006 10:04:22 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Let's all leave the US and return as undocumented trespassers....uh, immigrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

"Tuesday, the Boulder City Council will take up the matter of allocating public funding for a "hate hotline," which would give residents an opportunity to report incidents in which Boulderites use tactless language."

For what purpose? "Tactless language" is perfectly legal and cannot be deemed illegal other than by a Constitutional amenment.


5 posted on 05/15/2006 10:04:22 AM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

I doubt any niggardly educated poltroon could properly define, bigotry, racism or prejudice, including posters here on FR. I commend an old dictionary.


6 posted on 05/15/2006 10:05:17 AM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Ya beat me to it. They need a ton of phone calls reporting the most insignificant trivia as "hate speech".

An example: "I would like to report the news tonight used the term drunken driver which is hate speech for all who imbibe".

7 posted on 05/15/2006 10:05:37 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank a soldier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

Wonder if this applies to hate speech against Christians?

Probably not.


8 posted on 05/15/2006 10:06:52 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

Boulder, Colorado - 25 square miles of city, surrounded by reality.


9 posted on 05/15/2006 10:07:24 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

One of our local papers (The Lawrence Kansas Journal World) had a letter from a woman who objected because the photo on Sunday's front page showed a mother's hand holding her daughter's hand and ::::: gasp :::::: the mother had on a wedding ring.


10 posted on 05/15/2006 10:11:31 AM PDT by Mercat (It's still Easter and we are the Easter people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Millee

It would be fun to have a friend at the phone company redirect all the calls to a 1-900-sex-chat phone number and watch the heads explode.


11 posted on 05/15/2006 10:14:03 AM PDT by Toby06 (Make illegal immigration illegal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

You have to right to face your accuser. The ACLU can stuff it.


12 posted on 05/15/2006 10:14:34 AM PDT by weegee (Slowly but surely and deliberately, converativism is being made a thoughtcrime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
One of our local papers (The Lawrence Kansas Journal World) had a letter from a woman who objected because the photo on Sunday's front page showed a mother's hand holding her daughter's hand and ::::: gasp :::::: the mother had on a wedding ring.

Damn lesbos!

13 posted on 05/15/2006 10:15:09 AM PDT by Niteranger68 ("Only 4 out of 3 Democrats actually vote.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

I think 'Focus on the Family' would freak them out more. ;o)


14 posted on 05/15/2006 10:18:12 AM PDT by Millee (Tagline free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

The socialist left wants to criminalize conservativism. That is the end game of political correctness.

Consider this the 9-11 dry run. They'll report "haters" to The State but don't you even THINK about reporting that suspicious protestor with the "I support our troops when they shoot thier officers" sign.


15 posted on 05/15/2006 10:18:47 AM PDT by weegee (Slowly but surely and deliberately, converativism is being made a thoughtcrime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: polizoo

I can't BELIEVE I agree with the ACLU on this.


16 posted on 05/15/2006 10:18:54 AM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polizoo
"Our concern - and there are many - is that there is no confidentiality, no legal confidentiality," explains Judd Golden, chairman of the Boulder American Civil Liberties Union, which has not yet taken an official position on the hate-line. "So it's potentially chilling if people think they are providing this information in confidence and then that information were provided to the government or the government sought access to it."

I guess I would feel better if his concern was that the Constitution has a First Amendment.

17 posted on 05/15/2006 10:20:50 AM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Millee

Dr. Laura on the hold "muzak" too.


18 posted on 05/15/2006 10:21:25 AM PDT by Toby06 (Make illegal immigration illegal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Wonder if this applies to hate speech against Christians?

Or Republicans:


19 posted on 05/15/2006 10:21:51 AM PDT by weegee (Slowly but surely and deliberately, converativism is being made a thoughtcrime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
How can you agree with the ACLU on this? They don't even have a stance...

"...which has not yet taken an official position on the hate-line."

20 posted on 05/15/2006 10:23:46 AM PDT by weegee (Slowly but surely and deliberately, converativism is being made a thoughtcrime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson