[LexBaird]

Somehow I don't think you are too worried about Americans. More likely your clients in China.

It is useless to try to have a civil discussion with someone who takes any disagreement with viewpoint as an occasion to impute evil intent. You are dishonest in your debating methods, viz. your repeated use of insulting strawman arguments. If you wish to continue this with a more civil tone, let me know. Otherwise, I have no time to waste on you.

[Paul Ross]

Based on your response... wherein you ran for the tall grass as fast as your fingers could take you...I would surmise I hit close to the mark on all points.

Your protestations of umbrage are excessive and not credible. The reason I question your motivations so frankly, as much as you want to characterize them as "dishonest" is because you are so extremist, so far out into left field.

Totally without intellectual merit. Constitutionally, you are the one who was dishonest and unethical. You were busted you on it.

So rather than confront the substance of that misrepresentation you were busted on, you change the subject. You switch to outrage and evasion of further discussion. Typical of Leftist "Hit and Run" argumentation tactics.