Your protestations of umbrage are excessive and not credible. The reason I question your motivations so frankly, as much as you want to characterize them as "dishonest" is because you are so extremist, so far out into left field.
Totally without intellectual merit. Constitutionally, you are the one who was dishonest and unethical. You were busted you on it.
So rather than confront the substance of that misrepresentation you were busted on, you change the subject. You switch to outrage and evasion of further discussion. Typical of Leftist "Hit and Run" argumentation tactics.
You have not responded to me. You have responded to the strawman parodies of my positions, which you set up yourself. Examples from your posts:
"you are so extremist, so far out into left field."
"Totally without intellectual merit."
"More likely your clients in China. "
"You don't believe in enforcing our intellectual property."
"I can only assume from this screed that you oppose enforcement of our intellectual property laws that protect our inventions, trademarks and writings. Admit it. You do. Such opposition by you is definitively unamerican."
It is clear that you are not interested in debating my ideas honestly, but in distorting them so you can masturbate with your own. Look me up when you grow up.