Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
...this act bans the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines from participating in arrests, searches, seizure of evidence and other police-type activity on U.S. soil.

That was 'understood' to mean 'against US citizens'. It was not meant to restrict the repelling of foreign invasions. Two former presidents have placed troops on the southern border, specifically to deter foreign (Mexican) incursions. That is precedent.

President Wilson called out 15,000 militia and stationed them along the U.S. - Mexico border. [source link]

If this current exercise is simply to give each border patrol a hand-holding buddy, then it is a sham and an attempt to hoodwink the public.
47 posted on 05/13/2006 3:45:55 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy

You comment makes no sense. First of all they would not be "illegals" unless they were on US soil and therefore breaking the law. Breaking the law requires police type activities to arrest them for breaking the law. This prohibits that.

Where does it imply use citizens????


52 posted on 05/13/2006 3:55:31 PM PDT by MiHeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

After reading the amendment, it looks to me as if this is a Big Brother program for the Border Patrol. If I am right, what a farce. I hope noone buys it, I am not.


53 posted on 05/13/2006 3:57:52 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
Interesting little tidbit Tom. Thanks for finding it.

L

100 posted on 05/13/2006 11:06:32 PM PDT by Lurker (50% of the country is not fit to run a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson