Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/12/2006 9:18:14 AM PDT by xjcsa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: xjcsa

Now, how about DEPORTING ILLEGALS?


2 posted on 05/12/2006 9:18:48 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

It's about time!


3 posted on 05/12/2006 9:18:59 AM PDT by TommyDale (North Carolina looks forward to the disbarring of Mike Nifong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

Good stop gap measure while a fence is built.


4 posted on 05/12/2006 9:19:15 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

It would be a start.....good news, if true.


5 posted on 05/12/2006 9:19:17 AM PDT by yellowdoghunter (I sometimes only vote for Republicans because they are not Democrats....by Dr. Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

Until they start building the wall it's just smoke and mirrors.


7 posted on 05/12/2006 9:20:23 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

Sure he will. "We'll put the Guard on the border, and give amnesty to everyone who are here or can get in before we deploy."




Get ready for a stampede!!!


8 posted on 05/12/2006 9:20:28 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

Hmmm, imagine the liberals response to the military being deployed on the borders.....


Kinda makes me smile.


9 posted on 05/12/2006 9:20:37 AM PDT by eyespysomething (There is no theory of evolution, just a list of creatures Chuck Norris allows to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

I would like to know why they are there.
Is it to stop the flow or help them cause it might be hot???
They might need a drink of water and a ride.


10 posted on 05/12/2006 9:20:44 AM PDT by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

I voted for Bush twice ...I used to love him but if he does this Im never going to ...oh wait


nevermind


15 posted on 05/12/2006 9:21:04 AM PDT by woofie (Another actor with political ideas.................John Wilkes Booth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

If they actually make it to the border they will only be there long enough for the Bush/McCain/Kennedy Amnesty Bill to pass then they will be recalled.


16 posted on 05/12/2006 9:21:35 AM PDT by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

We shall see.


17 posted on 05/12/2006 9:21:45 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

Fox News was saying something about this early this morning, but gave no details. Did the President get the message? I guess we will find out Monday night.


19 posted on 05/12/2006 9:22:15 AM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa; All
NOTHING GROUND IN STONE YET. DRUDGE IS SLOW TODAY

Pentagon Exploring Border Control Patrols

The Pentagon is looking at ways the military can help provide more security along the U.S. southern border, defense officials said Thursday, once again drawing the nation's armed forces into a politically sensitive domestic role.

Paul McHale, the assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense, asked officials this week to come up with options for the use of military resources and troops - particularly the National Guard - along the border with Mexico, according to defense officials familiar with the discussions. The officials, who requested anonymity because the matter has not been made public, said there are no details yet on a defense strategy.

The request comes as some Southern lawmakers met this week with White House strategist Karl Rove for a discussion that included making greater use of National Guard troops to shore up border control. The Senate is poised to pass legislation this month that would call for additional border security, a new guest worker program and provisions opening the way to eventual citizenship for many of the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the country.

"The Texas delegation is very concerned about the border and are pushing urgency," said Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, who joined other Texas Republicans in a meeting with Rove this week. He said Rove was "very forthright" about border projects that Homeland Security is starting up, its current projects and what the needs are.

Rep. Ken Marchant, R-Texas, who also attended the meeting, said the lawmakers left "very encouraged."

Currently, the military plays a very limited role along the borders, but some armed forces have been used in the past to help battle drug traffickers. National Guard units, meanwhile, have been used at time by Southern and Western governors to provide assistance at border crossings.

Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano said the military help "is basically what she has been asking for," spokeswoman Jeanine L'Ecuyer said. Napolitano has been asking the Pentagon to send more National Guard troops - but not regular military - to confront illegal immigration from Mexico. About 170 National Guard troops are helping in such efforts in the state now.

Similarly, Texas Gov. Rick Perry hadn't specifically requested assistance from the military, but he liked the idea, according to spokeswoman Kathy Walt. "The assets are stretched thin, at least in Texas, because of the war on terror," she said. "The governor would welcome any effort by the federal government in meeting its responsibility to secure our border."

Defense officials said they have been asked to map out what military resources could be made available if needed - including options for using the National Guard under either state or federal control. The strategy would also explore the legal guidelines for use of the military on domestic soil, the officials said.

On Capitol Hill on Thursday, the House voted 252-171 to allow Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to assign military personnel under certain circumstances to help the Homeland Security Department with border security. The House added the provision to a larger military measure.

The National Guard is generally under the control of the state governors, but Guard units can be federalized by the president, such as those sent to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Active duty military cannot be used for law enforcement unless the president specifically decides to exercise that option.

Officials wrangled over the use of the active military during Hurricane Katrina, with some suggesting that troops be used for law enforcement to quell violence and looters in New Orleans. There were also suggestions that Bush federalize the National Guard there - removing them from state control, but state officials opposed that proposal. In the end, neither move was made.

At its peak during Katrina, the military had about 22,000 active-duty troops in the Gulf region, along with about 50,000 National Guard troops operating under the state governors' command. The active- duty military provided ships, helicopters, search-and-rescue aid, evacuations and other assistance.

In the aftermath of the hurricane, Bush asked Pentagon officials to review ways to give the military a bigger role in responding to major disasters. But officials are somewhat reluctant to make major changes, leery of the image of armed military troops patrolling U.S. cities.

Under the Civil War-era Posse Comitatus Act, federal troops are prohibited from performing law enforcement actions, such as making arrests, seizing property or searching people. In extreme cases, however, the president can invoke the Insurrection Act, also from the Civil War, which allows him to use active-duty or National Guard troops for law enforcement.

23 posted on 05/12/2006 9:22:30 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

Now watch... Bush will do some things that show he is listening, and moving in the right direction.

But nomatter what he does, it won't be "enough".


24 posted on 05/12/2006 9:22:33 AM PDT by Ramius (Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 1100 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

Knowing Bush's past views and efforts to stop illegal immigration, I will believe this will happen when the boots are on the ground.


26 posted on 05/12/2006 9:23:13 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

National Guard May Provide Security At Borders

May 12, 2006 9:31 a.m. EST

Andrea Moore - All Headline News Staff Reporter

Washington, D.C. (AHN) - Defense officials say the Pentagon is looking at ways the military can help provide more security along the U.S. southern border, drawing the nation's armed forces into a politically sensitive domestic role.

According to defense officials, Paul McHale, the assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense, asked officials this week to come up with options for the use of military resources and troops - particularly the National Guard - along the border with Mexico. There are no details yet on a defense strategy.

Defense officials say they have been asked to map out what military resources could be made available if needed - including options for using the National Guard under either state or federal control. The strategy would also explore the legal guidelines for use of the military on domestic soil, the officials said.

The National Guard is generally under the control of the state governors, but Guard units can be federalized by the president. Active duty military cannot be used for law enforcement unless the president specifically decides to exercise that option.


29 posted on 05/12/2006 9:24:19 AM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

Unless a fence is built, that would be a permanent deployment, right?


31 posted on 05/12/2006 9:24:34 AM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa
SOURCES: BUSH PLANS NATIONAL GUARD ON BORDER...

Yeah..right. Believe it when I see it!

39 posted on 05/12/2006 9:25:59 AM PDT by FixitGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

When, where, how many? The only acceptable strategy is to seal the border totally once and for all. If he does that I applaud him.


41 posted on 05/12/2006 9:26:10 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xjcsa

It's a start


42 posted on 05/12/2006 9:26:33 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson