The Devil Herself
Posted on 05/11/2006 2:54:59 PM PDT by SirLinksalot
Peligro Pelosi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: May 11, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Craig R. Smith
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
After watching Nancy Pelosi on "Meet the Press" on Sunday, I realized this November may just be the single most important election of my lifetime. This woman is without a doubt the most dangerous woman in America and we should pay close attention to what she is saying and equally to what she is not.
Tim Russert quizzed the Democrat from California on issues ranging from high fuel costs to a balanced budget. Like all "pie in the sky" Democrats, her answers were laced with all the usual "we can fix that, too" rhetoric, yet lacked any specifics on how to do it or who is going to pay for it. That is why voters are really going to be hard pressed to feel good about their vote come November. They don't want business as usual, yet fully reject the empty, nonspecific promises those like Pelosi are offering.
In May 2004 Pelosi said that Iraq had become a hotbed of terrorism and that we should stay until the job is completed. In November 2005, Pelosi supported Rep. John Murtha in his call for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Amazing what a difference a year and a half makes. On Sunday, she had found a new position entirely when pressed by Russert on why the change of heart. Now she wants the Democratic plan of "significant transition" in 2006. When asked why the sudden reverse in course by the congresswoman, she points to the generals:
Because it's not a – yes. I would withdraw them [the troops] because, on the strength of expert advice, and now you see the generals speaking out on this.
So let me get this straight Nancy. Iraq is still a hotbed of terrorism, and as you said in 2004, because it is, we cannot withdraw. Now that the generals have spoken out on this, we should withdraw? Do you even know what you believe anymore? Such sound advice from the future speaker of the House. Insanity.
Her highness goes on to share her wisdom and the wisdom of her leftwing colleagues on how they will move America to energy independence – they will wean us off of oil. When asked for a specific time, she answered with "absolutely and I don't know ..."
Russert, satisfied with the "when," pursued the "how":
We intend to send our energy dollars to the Midwest and rural America, not to the Middle East. We intend to focus on biofuels, we intend on alternative energy, conservation and efficiency ... Brazil is doing this.
Are you kidding me Nancy? Brazil uses about 3 percent of what we use in oil, gasoline and natural gas. Give me a break. The Great Democrat plan – full of emotion and void of reality.
Russert then asked how she would pay for all the subsidies that would be necessary to pay for such a pipe dream and whether she would roll back the Bush tax cuts. Three times, she artfully dodged the question and instead opted to blame George Bush for all the ills of America and the world. Eventually, she said she was against the tax cuts. She should have stopped there. It would have been the only truly honest, nonpolitical answer she offered. But no, she had to ruin the Kodak moment by adding that choices will need to be made and she will tell us more when she takes over Congress, leaving the door wide open for a full-scale Kerry-esque flip-flop in the future.
She offered concept, just no specifics. Hey, I would like to rule the world, but I can't offer you a specific plan on how I intend to do it. Neither can Pelosi and the Democrats offer a plan to fulfill their delusions. That apparently isn't enough to stop them from trying.
So make no mistake about it. When – not if, according to Pelosi – she and the Democrats take over Congress, they fully intend to change the future. They will remove troops from Iraq and leave a vacuum in a region she admits is a hotbed for terrorism. They will make America energy independent. Don't know how or when or who will pay for it, but trust Nancy – it will happen.
They will embark on a security course to keep the American people "safe." They will shut down the National Security Agency wiretap programs and not allow the intelligence community to listen to terrorists. But in the process, they will "protect the American people and the Constitution." That should be a good one to watch. I can only imagine how the intel folks will deal with FISA courts and the subsequent leaks that occur on NSA activity through the front page of the New York Times. It sure did us a great service with Abu Ghraib and the bogus story of guards flushing Qurans down the toilets at Gitmo. Thanks Michael Isikoff. Nancy will soon be in touch daily.
I could go on and on, but I won't, for her dangerous rhetoric bathed in delusion reached its pinnacle when she made the following comment: "What we are about is going there [Congress] and, and having high ethical standards, fiscal soundness and a level of civility that brushes away all this fierce partisanship."
I think I'm going to puke. This coming from a person who represents a party that called the president a liar and an idiot. The party that has for six years attempted to "get even" with a president who "stole" the election. The party of Al Gore screaming at the top of his lungs how the president "betrayed us" and "played on our fears"? Need I mention crazy Uncle Howard and his insane statements?
If there was ever a time in America for steady, rational, and sound thinking it is now.
We are at war with an enemy that will not stop until they kill us or we kill them.
We have energy challenges like no other time before as more developing nations compete for resources worldwide.
We need the strong reliable intelligence essential to our physical safety and security.
We are burdened with financial problems that may take decades to repair.
Do we want the likes of Pelosi to lead us going forward? I sure hope not.
That is why November 2006 may just be our only hope for successfully meeting these challenges. The Democrats have already made your decision for you. To quote Tim Russert, "You're measuring the draperies in the speaker's office." Ms. Pelosi had to hold herself back from answering yes.
Democrats have come to a conclusion. You are going to give them the Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008. They have made it clear that when that happens there will be investigations. John Conyers wants to immediately start impeachment proceedings against President Bush. I just hope they are wrong about winning. If they are not, I'm not sure the country will look a lot different after Peligro Pelosi and company is finished.
I can't imagine what years and years of investigations and impeachment hearings may produce. Probably the very distraction our enemy needs to finish the job they started on Sept. 11, 2001. I just hope the American people are wise enough to not allow that to happen come November.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Craig R. Smith is an author, commentator and popular media guest because he instantly engages audiences with his common-sense analyses of local, national and global trends. Serving as CEO of Swiss America for nearly 25 years, Craig understands that Americans want solid answers to the tough questions and that real leadership begins with servanthood. Craig's most recent book is "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil," which he co-authored with WND columnist Jerome R. Corsi. For media interviews please call Holly at 800-950-2428.
Well .. I agree with that .. but your statement really ddn't say that .. did it??
It's what I meant but wasn't clear enough.
Nancy is a Socialist. She is the chairman.
Go to http://www.dsa.org to check her out.
Go Nancy Go!
"Thanks for dropping by TROLL, See ya' later!"
--- Name calling is easy. Is a great socialist tool. You appear to use it well.
I notice that you cannot answer my question .... Is fear the only election strategy that the RNC can come up with?
California Leftists count on the rest of the U.S.A. to keep it afloat despite their reckless, profligate fiscal irresponsibility.
Just who will keep the United States afloat, once Leftists have done to it what they have done to California and France, they neglect to consider.
It is the ultimate in selfishness to squander the general resources in myopic, careless high-mindedness and self-congratulation or to indulge oneself in irresponsibility, denial, and hubris while actually endangering others. Such is deserving of contempt, certainly not admiration.
The Devil Herself
She will have plenty of distractions when her face lifts start sagging.
tooo funny...
Great graphic!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.