Skip to comments.
Senate Breaks Deadlock On Immigration
cbs4denver.com ^
| May 11, 2006
Posted on 05/11/2006 11:27:54 AM PDT by Sharks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
1
posted on
05/11/2006 11:27:55 AM PDT
by
Sharks
To: Sharks
To: Sharks
"Key to the agreement is who will be negotiating a compromise with the House and its tough enforcement-only bill."
I hope the House doesn't back down.
3
posted on
05/11/2006 11:30:54 AM PDT
by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Sharks
I yearn for the days of 'Gridlock'.
To: Preachin'
I hope the House doesn't back down.Agreed. Opening the bill to amendments provides a glimmer of hope.
5
posted on
05/11/2006 11:32:11 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Sharks
Translation: The GOP has just dropped it's pants and allowed the Rats that MSM to win the day.
This is why the GOP is affectionately known as the "Stupid Party" by those of us in the know.
6
posted on
05/11/2006 11:32:48 AM PDT
by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
To: Sharks
Hey Frist, what the HELL is wrong with the REPUBLICAN House Bill. Why do you feel the need to inject Kennedy's crap into a good bill? Which side are you on!!!?
8
posted on
05/11/2006 11:34:22 AM PDT
by
Spiff
("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Preachin'
I hope the House doesn't back down. Me too, the toughness of the original version is encouraging.
10
posted on
05/11/2006 11:36:04 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
To: Semper Paratus
I yearn for the days of 'Gridlock'. Because our current immigration system is working so well.
11
posted on
05/11/2006 11:36:11 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(Happy New Year! Breed like dogs!)
To: Sharks; gubamyster; HiJinx
12
posted on
05/11/2006 11:36:17 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(http://www.vasquezforidaho.org/)
To: Syncretic
I hope these @ssholes plan on having a lot of Mexicans vote for them, because I doubt if many Americans plan to............
13
posted on
05/11/2006 11:36:51 AM PDT
by
newcthem
(All along I thought I was an American.......now I find that I am just a racist.)
To: Sharks
...The multi-city boycott called a "Day Without Immigrants" was organized by immigrant activists angered by federal legislation that would criminalize the nation's estimated 11 million illegal immigrants...They must be letting the webmaster write the stories these days....
14
posted on
05/11/2006 11:37:01 AM PDT
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: Sharks
So, does this mean we are just "really, really screwed" instead of "really, really, really screwed"?
15
posted on
05/11/2006 11:37:10 AM PDT
by
Thrusher
("...there is no peace without victory.")
To: Semper Paratus
This isn't the first time Frist and Reid have reached an agreement on this. Their compromise hasn't been voted on yet. Hopefully we haven't broken the gridlock on this in the Senate yet, because the Senate version needs to die a horrible death.
To: The South Texan
This is why the GOP is affectionately known as the "Stupid Party" by those of us in the know. Bipartisanship is when the Stupid Party and the Evil Party get together to do something that is both Evil and Stupid. The Senate "not an amnesty plan, we promise" comes to mind.
17
posted on
05/11/2006 11:37:41 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Never ask a Kennedy if he'll have another drink. It's nobody's business how much he's had already.)
To: Sharks
Key to the agreement is who will be negotiating a compromise with the House and its tough enforcement-only bill. The House passed much more strict immigration legislation in December. It would subject the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States to felony charges as well as deportation.
Here's the only compromise I want to hear:
Deport the aliens WITHOUT charging them with a felony.
18
posted on
05/11/2006 11:38:16 AM PDT
by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: JohnnyZ
Hard to imagine the system now is worse than another 1986-type amnesty.
19
posted on
05/11/2006 11:39:16 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(http://www.vasquezforidaho.org/)
To: Sharks
Keep your powder dry, folks, this is probably good news.
What it MEANS is that the Republican Senators have looked at the polls, listened to their constituents, and realize that they are going to LOSE CONGRESS if they don't get a Border Fence.
They have a delicate dance to do here, because the President's been talking about amnesty and guest worker. There will probably be SOME of that in the reconciled bill.
But the big thing will be a lot of extended fence, a lot of high tech sensors on the border, vastly expanded border enforcement.
What will probably come out is a bill that essentially CLOSES the border and steps up enforcement, and oh-by-the-way has a generic sort of slow amnesty and discussion of some sort of guest worker program.
Remember: the KEY to the whole thing is getting the border closed. And that's almost certainly to come out of this bill.
If that's there, Border Conservatives will have something important to defend, and will need to vote GOP this fall.
20
posted on
05/11/2006 11:39:27 AM PDT
by
Vicomte13
(Paris vaut bien une messe...et le Congres vaut bien un mur.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson