Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
Advocates of that program, including General Michael Hayden, Bush's nominee to head the CIA, insist that it was lawful, even though it circumvents a law

Inquiring minds want to know....
Is "circumventing a law" the same thing as "breaking a law"?

46 posted on 05/11/2006 1:22:48 PM PDT by syriacus (WHERE has Geo. Clooney been for ALL the years that Franklin Graham has been helping the Sudanese?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: syriacus
Is "circumventing a law" the same thing as "breaking a law"?

How would we know? The White House has successfully (thus far) managed to end-run the courts and Department of Justice on this one, and keep any judicial body from reviewing the program for legality. They just wave their hands and say, "Oh, don't worry, it's legal. We're protecting you, see? Now...shhh...go back to sleep...that's right, sleep..."

If anyone actually read the stories on this so far, they'd find that Qwest asked the NSA to bounce their request off of the FISA court, and the NSA categorically refused, because the FISC might not agree with them. Why on earth would that happen? That court is usually VERY agreeable to such requests.

Then Qwest asked the NSA to get a letter from the Attorney General's office authorizing the data collection. Again, the NSA refused.

Wonder why? I can't imagine the AG of all people would refuse such a request, given his support for the program... Curious. Wonder what they're hiding...?

SW

61 posted on 05/11/2006 3:51:05 PM PDT by Snidely Whiplash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson