I'm not selectively citing it. I happen to have read the article about Connie over there last week and I know that it's the truth.
And that's Morris Dees' site.
So why would I now think the article about Simcox would be fabricated?
Okay, so the article about Connie is the truth. And it's a pretty favorable report, would be read by most conservatives as a positive assessment. So why, then, the hate-Connie posts? See, this is what I'm asking. I can't figure it out. You are using the positive assessment of Connie as a device to get people to accept the negative assessment of Simcox. But I am using the positive assessment of Connie, which you are obviously endorsing, as a device to question your bashing of her elsewhere.
Which is why I'm saying, to quote you, you can't have it both ways.