Okay, so the article about Connie is the truth. And it's a pretty favorable report, would be read by most conservatives as a positive assessment. So why, then, the hate-Connie posts? See, this is what I'm asking. I can't figure it out. You are using the positive assessment of Connie as a device to get people to accept the negative assessment of Simcox. But I am using the positive assessment of Connie, which you are obviously endorsing, as a device to question your bashing of her elsewhere.
Which is why I'm saying, to quote you, you can't have it both ways.
Connie is the spokesperson for the MM now; I pointed out that there was an article over there about her and simply asked was that one not true either.
I'm not sure I posted "hate-Connie" posts, as you described them, on this thread; I merely pointed out that she's not welcome around here.