Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy

Clinton never got 46% of the vote. In 1992, he got 43%, and, in '96, he got 49%.

Sometimes, if a Republican is too liberal for me, I vote for a minor-party candidate. I read the poll results, in Oct. If the result is close, I vote for the Republican, since I don't want to help split the anti-Democrat vote, helping the Democrat win with less than a majority. If I know that the election won't be close, I vote for the candidate with whom I agree the most. In 2002, democrat governors were elected, with less than 50% of the vote in Wisconsin, Oklahoma, and Oregon, because, in each state, the anti-democrat vote was split between a Republican and a libertarian or conservative independent. No Republican was elected governor, in that year, because the liberals split their votes. The liberals were better at working together. I hope that, from now on, conservatives will work together better, in close elections.


1,812 posted on 05/15/2006 2:34:27 PM PDT by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1805 | View Replies ]


To: PhilCollins

Obviously, that means only small side offices have been ones you could vote other ways on, because when it comes to Gov, President and so on, I don't know in recent years if you have had any one sided votes at all.

I think there has been lots of close votes everywhere the last decade especially.


1,813 posted on 05/15/2006 2:38:51 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1812 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson