Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Photo IDs could improve image of election process
Chicago Sun Times ^ | 5/10/06 | ED FEULNER

Posted on 05/10/2006 12:41:11 PM PDT by mathprof

"Vote early -- and often." We hear this quip every time an election rolls around, and with good reason: Electoral fraud is as old as the ballot box itself and still happens in the United States. Just last year a judge in Washington state ruled that some 1,678 illegal votes were cast in its 2004 election -- more than enough to change the outcome of the governor's race.

Few concepts matter more in a republican democracy than the credibility of "one person, one vote." Yet no nationwide standard exists to prevent fraud at the voting booth.

Some states, including Virginia, sensibly demand photo identification before allowing someone to vote. Neighboring Maryland, meanwhile, is heading in the opposite direction. A new state law there will let anyone cast a provisional ballot anywhere in the state -- a move that could allow one person to vote in several different places on the same day.

At the end of Election Day, "Nothing is more important than the integrity of elections -- not even defeating the Republicans in November." And don't take my word for it; those are the words of Blair Lee IV, the Democratic commentator who ran his father's successful 1980 gubernatorial campaign in Maryland.

To prevent fraud in elections, the federal government should set some minimum standards. After all, the Constitution gives states the initial power to establish the "times, places and manner" of holding elections, but it specifically permits Congress to change those election procedures.

A good first step would be to require every voter to show a photo ID.

Some liberals oppose this rudimentary reform. They claim that, since the poor are less likely to have photo IDs or driver's licenses, it would impinge on their civil right to vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ballotstuffing; election; electionfraud; electionlaws; fec; feclaws; howtostealanelection; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Cementjungle
Of course I was about the only Republican in the neighborhood and always had just one booth instead of the seven Dem booths set up.

They have separate booths for Republicans and Democrats in LA? I've never heard of such a thing...

21 posted on 05/10/2006 2:29:11 PM PDT by Kaylee Frye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ol' hoghead
I always take my ID with me where ever I go..I am a licensed gun owner so have to make sure that I have my counseled weapons permit with me and driver license..at all times..What you mentioned is a good thing to know for others though..
22 posted on 05/10/2006 2:29:30 PM PDT by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Good for you..everyone should think about getting their loved ones out of the LA area..Unless of course you have a body guard and security all around..LOL!


23 posted on 05/10/2006 2:31:29 PM PDT by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaylee Frye
They have separate booths for Republicans and Democrats in LA? I've never heard of such a thing...

That's Los Angeles, and yes, they did.

24 posted on 05/10/2006 2:33:45 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal
Indiana just started a photo ID requirement this year. I'm surprised the Chicago Sun-Times didn't mention that their neighboring state is doing this.
25 posted on 05/10/2006 2:43:24 PM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle
Wow, seems like that should be illegal.... Just like I never thought it was right that I should have to state my party when registering to vote in NC. It seems like a way to get around the whole concept of anonymous voting.

Oh, and sorry to imply that you were talking about Louisiana, I just figured everybody used the shorthand LA for Los Angeles.

26 posted on 05/10/2006 2:55:37 PM PDT by Kaylee Frye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaylee Frye
Wow, seems like that should be illegal.... Just like I never thought it was right that I should have to state my party when registering to vote in NC. It seems like a way to get around the whole concept of anonymous voting.

The good thing about it was that I never had to wait in line!

27 posted on 05/10/2006 3:28:45 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson