Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

Why the rush to touch-screen? Machine-readable paper ballots are just as fast and leave a better audit trail. They work well for local elections here in Toronto, but don't get me started on the clowns they declare as winners...


4 posted on 05/10/2006 9:41:30 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Yay! It's Riding Season!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Squawk 8888

Don't you remember? Touch Screen voting machines were demanded for by the Democrats after Florida. They said it was Racist not to have the latest technology in those districts. But, isn't difficult to hack into a Stand Alone Machine that is not on a network?


21 posted on 05/10/2006 10:30:15 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Squawk 8888
Machine-readable paper ballots are just as fast and leave a better audit trail

That's precisely the problem with them. It's harder to "fix" elections with paper ballots.

37 posted on 05/10/2006 2:00:17 PM PDT by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Squawk 8888
Machine-readable paper ballots are just as fast and leave a better audit trail.

In my county, we recently switched from paper to touch-screen. We get a paper printout of who we voted for, but election officials/monitors don't keep a copy. There is absolutely NO papertrail.

47 posted on 05/12/2006 1:17:24 PM PDT by kellyrae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson