To: Firefigher NC
The man had been licensed to own the guns, but he isn't allowed to keep them under the court order, reports said.
scratchin my head...has to be more to this story than this article.
18 posted on
05/09/2006 8:01:30 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(There's no place like 127.0.0.1)
To: stylin19a
There has to be more to this story than the article says. While it chaps me to no end to hear the MSM call his collection a "cache" of "exotic" weapons, I am going to give the father (it is HIS house) the benefit of the doubt. He does live with this young man (and his younger siblings) and perhaps he had reason to fear for his and/or his children's safety. Not enough information to know. As far as the weapons confiscation, at least here it is standard language in a restraining order to restrict the person's access to weapons. Actually makes sense if a restraining order is being used to "protect" an innocent....but that's a whole other thread!!
33 posted on
05/09/2006 8:15:29 PM PDT by
zgirl
To: traviskicks
The man had been licensed to own the guns, but he isn't allowed to keep them under the court order, reports said.Ping
110 posted on
05/10/2006 4:49:39 AM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson