To: stylin19a
There has to be more to this story than the article says. While it chaps me to no end to hear the MSM call his collection a "cache" of "exotic" weapons, I am going to give the father (it is HIS house) the benefit of the doubt. He does live with this young man (and his younger siblings) and perhaps he had reason to fear for his and/or his children's safety. Not enough information to know. As far as the weapons confiscation, at least here it is standard language in a restraining order to restrict the person's access to weapons. Actually makes sense if a restraining order is being used to "protect" an innocent....but that's a whole other thread!!
33 posted on
05/09/2006 8:15:29 PM PDT by
zgirl
To: zgirl
thanks for a decent dialog and the info.
The article still reads too generic and still no logic
The man's father found the weapons and, worried about the safety of his younger sons, filed a restraining order Friday against the 23-year-old, reports said.
Big hole, here.
I read this that the son wasn't threatening anybody.( appears nobody knew about the weapons until father found them)
Father doesn't talk with his son ?
Just gets a restraining order ? Restraining order for what ? from what ?
Still has to be more to this story.
58 posted on
05/09/2006 8:44:13 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(There's no place like 127.0.0.1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson