do I really have to say it???
Posted on 05/09/2006 12:38:11 PM PDT by topher
You are so wrong. Don't you realize that as abortion is accepted so then embryonic stem cell research is accepted. All of it is to devalue human life and make man the creator. Now we also are seeing life devalued in old people. If they cannot pay they are killed. Don't you understand that God is life? If humans want to kill the life that God created, whom do we harm the most? We have destroyed life in an attempt to make God impotent. All of this anti-life stuff is from the pit of hell and the more we humans accept it, the closer we are to living in hell.
Okay I'm sorry, I feel so unclean now. Calling Linda Tripp! Calling Linda Tripp. (:^*)
How many interns were on his campaign?
"If clinton could make ru-486 legal by executive order why can't president Bush make it illegal?"
Or is the question, why won't he?
why are they so against birht?
There is nothing these two wont do for money or votes. Wonder how much they got out of selling that tainted blood to Canada when he was governor of Arkansas?
AhHa...their first priority was to make it easier to kill more babies......
AND THE SECOND WAS GAYS IN THE MILITARY.
I don't know much about Judicial Watch, but, based on the way the report was written, this was not a report intended to inform undecided people researching or just learning about the subject. It was written to preach to the choir. After 8 pages, I stopped reading just because I lost confidence in what they were reporting. They didn't report facts; they editorialized facts and presented them in a way that was intended to force the reader to view them with the writer's bias. That's fine for editorials, blogs, etc. They just shouldn't try to give the impression that they are presenting objective facts when they obviously aren't, IMHO. But it does provide a good source for research.
I knew I hated that bastard for some reason. Well, that's all the reason I need.
do I really have to say it???
Judicial watch is where indictments go to die...
What did Cardinal Mahony, McCarrick and Keeler ever say or do about the Clinton's abortion agenda?
These 3 cardinals talk about the rights of illegal aliens but do not put forth the same amount of effort in dealing with the rights of the unborn?
I do remember a small, festy nun by the name of Mother Teresa who gave the Clintons hell over abortion... Bill Clinton thought it was funny at the time...
However, when Cardinal O'Connor was alive, Clinton was UNINVITED to speak at the famous SMITH Dinner in New York City.
I can only hope that McCarrick is retired and replaced by the Shepherd of Denver, Archbishop Charles J. Chaput, OFM Cap.
McCarrick definitely had foot-in-mouth disease with how he handled the then Cardinal Ratzinger letter. Cardinal Ratzinger is now Pope Benedict XVI, and I don't he will forget how McCarrick butchered his letter.
But what do I know.
I know Archbishop Chaput keeps brother Capuchin Sean O'Malley in high regard... Let's see if Cardinal O'Malley will get the oppourtunity to speak about Senators Kerry and Kennedy...
The Roman Catholic Church had a number of Archbishops, Bishops and a few Cardinals speak out against electing a pro-abortion President in 2004, and this no doubt helped President Bush with his re-election.
Pope Benedict appears to be coming through with a broom, but it takes a Pope time to replace Cardinals.
He has focused alot of attention on the Dioceses in India.
And even during the Papacy of John Paul, there were a number of Dioceses that had Bishops retired and the Diocese without a bishop - a sign that the last two popes have been very cautious about who they replace bishops with.
If I were a betting man, I would bet McCarrick is replaced by Archbishop Chaput who would then eventually become Cardinal. If this does happen, it will be great for a number of people.
Also the Archbishop of Saint Louis is quite outspoken on the abortion issue, so he might be a candidate to replace McCarrick.
Sorry to ramble...
Is there no evil that those two haven't touched? I hope that scum can be sued, but I doubt it. He seems to be immune to any consequences.
Sounds like blatant self interest to me.
You have no idea how that fact upsets me. I can not believe that any freeper could possibly think this way, but you are right, they do.
Gee, shocking. Clinton endorsed RU486. Why are we still talking about him at all?
I share your disbelief, grief and outrage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.