Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Possible Bump to the Debt Ceiling (to nearly $10 TRILLION)
Washington Post ^ | May 9, 2006 | Jonathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray

Posted on 05/09/2006 11:04:47 AM PDT by soccer_maniac

A $2.7 trillion budget plan pending before the House would raise the federal debt ceiling to nearly $10 trillion, less than two months after Congress last raised the federal government's borrowing limit.

The provision -- buried on page 121 of the 151-page budget blueprint -- serves as a backdrop to congressional action this week. House leaders hope to try once again to pass a budget plan for fiscal 2007, a month after a revolt by House Republican moderates and Appropriations Committee members forced leaders to pull the plan.

With passage of the budget, the House will have raised the federal borrowing limit by an additional $653 billion, to $9.62 trillion. It would be the fifth debt-ceiling increase in recent years, after boosts of $450 billion in 2002, a record $984 billion in 2003, $800 billion in 2004 and $653 billion in March. When Bush took office, the statutory borrowing limit stood at $5.95 trillion.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: debt; deficit; otherpeoplesmoney; outofcontrolspending; porkaddicts; spending; spendingspree; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Dead Corpse

Well the deficit is shrinking and the thanks to tax cuts and growing economy so is the debt burden. The historical peak for the debt was 120% of GDP following WWII, so the present debt burden is really not a big deal so long America can maintain a growing economy, by say…KEEPING DEMON-RATS OUT OF OFFICE!


41 posted on 05/10/2006 7:29:27 AM PDT by ElTianti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ElTianti
The deficit is shrinking? Only as a percentage of GDP and only because the FedGov is raking more in in taxes they can turn around and spend.

Er... we could be cutting spending NOW and paying down the debt with supposed "conservatives" holding the House, the Senate, and the Executive. No sign of that happening.

Yes. Rats would be worse. But right now the GOP'ers in office are spending like Rats so there isn't a whole lot of difference.

42 posted on 05/10/2006 7:34:22 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The deficit is shrinking? Only as a percentage of GDP and only because the FedGov is raking more in in taxes they can turn around and spend.

That's the only meaningful measure!
43 posted on 05/10/2006 8:17:33 AM PDT by ElTianti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ElTianti
No. The only meaningful measure is how much is coming out of the taxpayers pocket. A rise in the individuals share of the Federal debt is NEVER a good thing.

Especially since we can go right down the latest spending spree bill and find numerous examples of Extra-Constitutional programs being funded. The FedGov has a limited set of duties to perform. Anything else should be CUT. It'd save us trillions in unfunded liabilities.

44 posted on 05/10/2006 8:19:57 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ElTianti

I don't mean to pick on you, but you set yourself up as someone who knows things yet you make the silliest comments.

Debt/GDP is the only relevant measure? Do you realize that GDP includes gov't spending? Also, GDP is not a very reliable number as it's calculated by a gov't agency and it's based on significant assumptions and forward looking estimates.


45 posted on 05/10/2006 10:26:55 AM PDT by soccer_maniac (Do some good while browsing FR --> Join our Folding@Home Team# 36120: keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac

Thank God the Republicans are in power /sarcasm


46 posted on 05/10/2006 10:27:44 AM PDT by piceapungens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

Yeah, that would solve this whole problem.


47 posted on 05/10/2006 10:28:01 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

The National Debt has continued to increase an average of $1.95 billion per day since September 30, 2005!

It takes a lot of taxpayers to collect $2 billion in taxes.


48 posted on 05/10/2006 10:28:19 AM PDT by soccer_maniac (Do some good while browsing FR --> Join our Folding@Home Team# 36120: keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac

But, when adjusted for inflation as a % of GDP...


49 posted on 05/10/2006 10:28:46 AM PDT by Glenn (There is a looming Tupperware shortage. Plan appropriately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac
So know a trillion and a half or so off and you still get a not so scary debt burdon.

US April budget surplus $118.85 bln
50 posted on 05/10/2006 11:38:47 AM PDT by ElTianti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ElTianti

know=knock


51 posted on 05/10/2006 11:39:42 AM PDT by ElTianti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac
Are you saying a debt and an unfunded liability are the same?

No answer? Realize your error?

52 posted on 05/10/2006 2:46:47 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Are you saying a debt and an unfunded liability are the same?

Yes, they both appear in the liabilites section of the Balance Sheet.

53 posted on 05/10/2006 3:59:25 PM PDT by soccer_maniac (Do some good while browsing FR --> Join our Folding@Home Team# 36120: keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac
If GM borrows money from a bank, the bank has a claim on GM's assets. That's a debt.

If GM promises to pay the health benefits of retired workers and their families, that's an unfunded liability. If GM decided tomorrow not to pay them anymore, they'd have no claim on GM's assets.

If the Feds decided tomorrow to stop paying Social Security, recipients would have no legal claim to benefits.

54 posted on 05/10/2006 6:19:56 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

The US GDP is about 11 Trillion so the debt cieling is not 89% of GDP.


55 posted on 05/10/2006 6:32:44 PM PDT by rmlew (Sedition and Treason are both crimes, not free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: soccer_maniac

Very interesting. What is that rumbling noise I hear? No, it's not the fiber.


56 posted on 05/10/2006 6:36:53 PM PDT by devane617 (The truth, not politics, is right for our beautiful America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson