Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rodguy911
but a third party will only split the vote.

If done right, however, it could turn out to be a good thing. The ole Southern Democrats were basically conservative. Add to those the conservative Republicans and Independents. The combination could be greater than the remaining left wacko Dems and progressive rino big-government-screw-the-little-guy Pubbies. It could result in a viable, signifcant, substantial 3rd party that is neither Democrat nor Republican, but is true conservative party.
216 posted on 05/09/2006 7:59:22 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy
I've made my arguments and will not argue with you. I have too much respect for your stands on too many issues. You guys know how I think, no sense in beating a dead horse.
228 posted on 05/09/2006 8:04:01 AM PDT by rodguy911 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

Considering the nature of the invasion, maybe we'll end up with two significant new parties--"La Raza" and "Conservative"--


235 posted on 05/09/2006 8:08:07 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
If done right, however, it could turn out to be a good thing. The ole Southern Democrats were basically conservative. Add to those the conservative Republicans and Independents. The combination could be greater than the remaining left wacko Dems and progressive rino big-government-screw-the-little-guy Pubbies. It could result in a viable, signifcant, substantial 3rd party that is neither Democrat nor Republican, but is true conservative party.

That would be the ideal outcome and likely the best for the nation. I'm afraid if legalization of current illegals goes through on immigration within a decade we will start seeing some very nasty events similar to Paris. Some people being forced out of jobs are gonna be mad. One deep recession would do it. Help wanted signs are a sign of a good economy. Not hiring signs as we saw plenty of in 1982 is not.

237 posted on 05/09/2006 8:08:31 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson