Posted on 05/08/2006 7:26:46 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
SPYCHIPPED LEVI'S BRAND JEANS HIT THE U.S. Levi Strauss Confirms RFID Test, Refuses to Disclose Location
It may be time to ditch your Dockers and lay off the Levi's, say privacy activists Katherine Albrecht and Liz McIntyre. New information confirms that Levi Strauss & Co. is violating a call for a moratorium on item-level RFID by spychipping its clothing. What's more, the company is refusing to disclose the location of its U.S. test.
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is a controversial technology that uses tiny microchips to track items from a distance. These RFID microchips have earned the nickname "spychips" because each contains a unique identification number, like a Social Security number for things, that can be read silently and invisibly by radio waves. Over 40 of the world's leading privacy and civil liberties organizations have called for a moratorium on chipping individual consumer items because the technology can be used to track people without their knowledge or consent.
Jeffrey Beckman, Director of Worldwide and U.S. Communications for Levi Strauss, confirmed his company's chipping program in an email exhange with McIntyre, saying "a retail customer is testing RFID at one location [in the U.S.]...on a few of our larger-volume core men's Levi's jeans styles." However, he refused to name the location.
"Out of respect for our customer's wishes, we are not going to discuss any specifics about their test," he said. Beckman also confirmed the company is tagging Levi Strauss clothing products, including Dockers brand pants, at two of its franchise locations in Mexico.
McIntyre was tipped off to the activity by a mention in an industry publication. The article indicated Levi Strauss was looking for additional RFID "test partners."
Albrecht believes the companies are keeping mum about the U.S. test location in order to prevent a consumer backlash. Clothing retailer Benetton was hit hard by a consumer boycott led by Albrecht in 2003 when the company announced plans to embed RFID tags in its Sisley line of women's clothing. The resulting consumer outcry forced the company to retreat from its plans and disclaim its intentions.
Levi Strauss can little afford similar problems with consumers. It is one of the world's largest brand-name apparel marketers with a presence in more than 110 countries, but has suffered through several years of declining sales as younger consumers gravitate to new brands. The company has also been hurt by Wal-Mart's decision to cut back on inventory in a bid to shore up its own declining sales.
While Levi Strauss reports that its current RFID trials use external RFID "hang tags" that can be clipped from the clothes and the focus is on inventory management, not customer tracking, the company isn't guaranteeing how it will use RFID in the future.
"Companies like Levi Strauss are painting their RFID trials as innocuous," observes Albrecht. "But this technology is extraordinarily dangerous. There is a reason why we have asked companies not to spychip clothing. Few things are more intimately connected with an individual than the clothes they wear."
"Once clothing manufacturers begin applying RFID to hang tags, the floodgates will open and we'll soon find these things sewn into the hem of our jeans," Albrecht adds. "The problem with RFID is that it is tracking technology, plain and simple."
Albrecht and McIntyre point out that tracking people through the things they wear and carry is more than mere speculation. In their book "Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID," they reveal sworn patent documents that describe ways to link the unique serial numbers on RFID-tagged items with the people who purchase them.
One of the most graphic examples is IBM's "Identification and Tracking of Persons Using RFID-Tagged Items." In that patent application, IBM inventors suggest tracking consumers for marketing and advertising purposes.
"That's enough to steam most consumers," says McIntyre."But IBM's proposal that the government track people through RFID tags on the things they wear and carry should send a cold chill down our spines."
IBM inventors detail how the government could use RFID tags to track people in public places like shopping malls, museums, libraries, sports arenas, elevators, and even restrooms.
"Make no mistake," McIntyre adds. "Today's RFID inventory tags could evolve into embedded homing beacons. Unchecked, this technology could become a Big Brother bonanza and a civil liberties nightmare."Technically Speaking An Interview With Katherine Albrecht, Author & RFID Watchdog
Katherine Albrecht has been called the Erin Brockovich of RFID. She defines a consumer privacy expert, however, as “someone who pays attention to the risks that consumers run when they go about their regular business.” Albrecht’s actions would seem to back up her words. She’s the founder and director of CASPIAN (Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering), a consumer watchdog group that has more than 12,000 subscribers to its Web site (www.nocards.org) and representatives in all 50 states and 30 countries. Albrecht, who’s finishing up a doctorate degree in consumer education at Harvard University, is also the co-author of “Spychips: How Major Corporations And Government Plan To Track Your Every Move With RFID.”
by Barry Brenesal
CPU: What is your main concern about RFID technology?
Albrecht: It’s an incredibly powerful technology that easily lends itself to abuse. RFID readers can be placed invisibly in the environment. RFID tags can be placed on clothes and in people’s belongings. And maybe the most worrisome part is that the companies that are aiming to put the readers in the environment and the tags into people’s belongings have spelled out some pretty frightening plans for how they hope to abuse the technology—literally to use it to spy on people.
CPU: What could RFID tagging track, for example?
Albrecht: Probably the best example is a patent from IBM called “Identification and tracking of persons using RFID-tagged items.” They filed it a few years back. IBM has been in on the RFID/EPC (Electronic Prod....
There are probably many ways, but disabling every pacemaker and other electronic device within a 100 yard radius may not be appreciated...
Dutch RFID e-passport cracked -- US next?
RFID Passports: Improved, but still flawed?
Opps! This last one does indicate that there will be encryption - my info was out-of-date - so at least there's that. Whatever the case, here's what someone could pick up if they decrypt the data:
Now, with that out of the way: What the State Department is proposing is that the RFID-enabled passports carry at least a duplicate copy of all the passport holder's personal information, and a digitized photograph, encoded into the chip. They've left expansion room for, supposedly, biometric data such as a fingerprint or retinal scan.
With regard to the latter, all they need to settle on is what kind of biometric data they want to require.
So um... anybody got some seed money kicking around?
Our engine shop had a oil soak bearing heater - but what about a degausser? We had a bearing degausser that you could hear go off on the other side of the hangar, and you couldn't wear a watch within ten feet of the bearing room, or it would toast it when they fired it off.
Yeah, some jerk would prolly be upset over his pace maker frying, even if you tried to explain to him that it is for the greater good.=o)
Interesting. I wonder if retailers and consumers would pay money to zap their clothing in shops like yours...
Or personal data that only you would know, like, the name of your dog, your wife's maiden name, the nickname for your hampster, the name of your great aunt's second cousin once removed.
Kind of like in lieu of tanning salons?
Then why not de-activate or remove them at the register?
Yes, it certainly will improve logistics.
Perhaps I should have said "legitimate advantage". Certainly getting one's passport out to show it to people who have a legitimate need to see it is a minor inconvenience compared to everything else involved with international travel.
http://www.difrwear.com/products.shtml
found this after the first time RFID passports were mentioned online.
I'd be afraid that altering or disabling the rfid on the new passports will put a person under greater TSA scrutiny for all future internatinal and domestic flights.
I see a market for tempest shielded pouches that inhibits the RFID transceivers when passports are not being used for identification purposes.
Here is a possible home brew remedy, turn your class D or class E microwave into a iron forge. I think it might melt the entire passport though.
http://home.c2i.net/metaphor/mvpage.html
Yesterday I bought a new pair of Dickie's work pants and one of the hang tags was plain white, nothing on it. I held it up to the light and sure enough, the RFID antenna was plain as day.
Before I would buy anything you were selling with this I would need some proof that this capability wouldn't be going home with me. If you implement this without that assurance, I wish you the best of luck in finding your next job.
Where did you buy them?
What if this became common place in a nation like Ruwanda or Sudan, Tutsies and Christians wouldn't stand a chance, they couldn't even meet to lay plans for for self defense without the knowledge of who attended, where, and where troops were massing to stage counter attacks. They couldn't even hide without being found. Taken to it's worse case scenario this could be far more than a benign tracking of goods and blue jeans.
But I doubt the technology is advanced enough and may never take that direction anyway. It's just disturbing that many things invented for the common good ends up being perverted into something devastatingly destructive and corrupt.
For instants most agencies formed and laws passed in D.C. that are suppose to be a benefit end up being a disaster by not only not fulfilling their reason for existance, but often time actually working against it's on purpose for existance. Like Welfare, Medicare, the Public School system, the INS, the CIA, the Patriot Act,HUD, government banking rules and regulations, "Know your customer", the list just goes on and on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.