Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxesareforever
As usual, you have provided me with absolutely nothing.

I believe that you are applying an incorrect usage of the phrase. That you choose to ignore what I have provided does not mean that I have not actually provided anything.
447 posted on 06/01/2006 1:49:53 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
From YOUR article: 3.0 The Context of Reports of Observed Speciations The literature on observed speciations events is not well organized. I found only a few papers that had an observation of a speciation event as the author's main point (e.g. Weinberg, et al. 1992). In addition, I found only one review that was specifically on this topic (Callaghan 1987). This review cited only four examples of speciation events. Why is there such a seeming lack of interest in reporting observations of speciation events? In my humble opinion, four things account for this lack of interest. First, it appears that the biological community considers this a settled question. Many researchers feel that there are already ample reports in the literature.

Come on. Give some substance intstead of "it appears that the biological community considers this a settled question". Based on what. NON-DATA. They just said it. Typical for evos.

455 posted on 06/01/2006 8:41:48 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson