To: Dimensio
From YOUR article: 3.0 The Context of Reports of Observed Speciations The literature on observed speciations events is not well organized. I found only a few papers that had an observation of a speciation event as the author's main point (e.g. Weinberg, et al. 1992). In addition, I found only one review that was specifically on this topic (Callaghan 1987). This review cited only four examples of speciation events. Why is there such a seeming lack of interest in reporting observations of speciation events? In my humble opinion, four things account for this lack of interest. First, it appears that the biological community considers this a settled question. Many researchers feel that there are already ample reports in the literature.Come on. Give some substance intstead of "it appears that the biological community considers this a settled question". Based on what. NON-DATA. They just said it. Typical for evos.
To: taxesareforever
Come on. Give some substance intstead of "it appears that the biological community considers this a settled question". Based on what. NON-DATA. They just said it. Typical for evos.
You are incorrect. Nowhere in your cited excerpt was a claim that the question is settled based upon "non-data".
457 posted on
06/01/2006 8:43:17 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson