[taxesareforever]

I have never said that I would not consider creationist facts. You have not provided any facts to consider.

That is because you have rejected everything that has been given you.

Here's something for you to comtemplate. If a person was to tell you that they had witnessed a nuclear explosion would you pursue seeking out all their evidence or would you turn to science and try to prove how, when and where it happened? I do believe I know what your answer will be.

[Dimensio]

That is because you have rejected everything that has been given you.

When I have rejected claims that you have presented, I have given rationale for doing so. Typically, the claims that you have presented are founded in factual errors.

Here's something for you to comtemplate. If a person was to tell you that they had witnessed a nuclear explosion would you pursue seeking out all their evidence or would you turn to science and try to prove how, when and where it happened? I do believe I know what your answer will be.

I would request further explanation of their claim. Without any detail beyond the initial claim, I would have no means of an evaluation.