Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: taxesareforever
That is because you have rejected everything that has been given you.

When I have rejected claims that you have presented, I have given rationale for doing so. Typically, the claims that you have presented are founded in factual errors.

Here's something for you to comtemplate. If a person was to tell you that they had witnessed a nuclear explosion would you pursue seeking out all their evidence or would you turn to science and try to prove how, when and where it happened? I do believe I know what your answer will be.

I would request further explanation of their claim. Without any detail beyond the initial claim, I would have no means of an evaluation.
402 posted on 05/28/2006 6:33:03 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
I would request further explanation of their claim. Without any detail beyond the initial claim, I would have no means of an evaluation.

Exactly what I thought you would say. Goodbye.

404 posted on 05/28/2006 8:29:51 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson