To: taxesareforever
That is because you have rejected everything that has been given you.
When I have rejected claims that you have presented, I have given rationale for doing so. Typically, the claims that you have presented are founded in factual errors.
Here's something for you to comtemplate. If a person was to tell you that they had witnessed a nuclear explosion would you pursue seeking out all their evidence or would you turn to science and try to prove how, when and where it happened? I do believe I know what your answer will be.
I would request further explanation of their claim. Without any detail beyond the initial claim, I would have no means of an evaluation.
402 posted on
05/28/2006 6:33:03 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
I would request further explanation of their claim. Without any detail beyond the initial claim, I would have no means of an evaluation.Exactly what I thought you would say. Goodbye.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson