Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group Wants Women To Get Morning-After Pill Prescription
The Indy Channel ^ | May 8, 2006 | AP

Posted on 05/08/2006 9:51:50 AM PDT by Abathar

WASHINGTON -- Get an advance prescription for emergency contraception so it will be on hand if you need it, the nation's largest gynecologist group advised women Monday.

The new campaign aims to increase access to the morning-after pill following the Bush administration's refusal to allow the emergency birth control to be sold over the counter nationwide.

"We want women to be prepared, well before a contraceptive failure or unprotected sex occurs. Afterward may be too late," said Dr. Michael Mennuti, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The morning-after pill is a high dose of regular birth control pills. It cuts the chances of pregnancy by up to 89 percent if used within 72 hours of rape, condom failure or just forgetting routine contraception.

The earlier it's taken, the more effective it is. But it can be hard to find a doctor to write a prescription in time, especially on weekends and holidays.

Citing assessments that easier access could halve the nation's 3 million annual unplanned pregnancies, ACOG and many women's groups have backed an attempt by Plan B's maker to sell the morning-after pill without a prescription, the way it's sold in Britain and Canada -- and in a handful of U.S. states.

But last year, top-ranking Food and Drug Administration officials overruled their own scientists' decision that nonprescription sales would be safe and, citing concern that young teens might use the pills, indefinitely postponed a decision.

The drug has no effect if a woman is already pregnant. It works by blocking ovulation or fertilization.

Conservatives who consider the pill tantamount to abortion have intensely lobbied the White House to reject nonprescription sales, saying they could increase teen sex.

The new "Ask me" campaign takes the discussion back to doctors' offices. ACOG is providing its 49,000 members with waiting-room posters to urge women of childbearing age to ask about a prescription they could keep on hand in case they need emergency contraception in the future.

"Accidents happen," the posters say.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2006 9:51:54 AM PDT by Abathar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Morning after WHAT?


Oh right. Let's not state facts.


2 posted on 05/08/2006 9:53:19 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

There is no "morning after" for the child.


3 posted on 05/08/2006 9:54:01 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

The Activism sidebar is reserved for Activism, protests, news and business of Free Republic Chapters.

Not articles such as this.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1611173/posts

Thanks,


4 posted on 05/08/2006 9:54:19 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

There's no need for the morning after pill prescriptions if women who are unmarried abstain from sex. (Rape victims could get it at the hospital when they go in to be checked over.)


5 posted on 05/08/2006 9:54:46 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

I don't want it over the counter because I can imagine some idiot teen taking it a couple times a month, and I can't imagine that's good for you.


6 posted on 05/08/2006 9:54:56 AM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
The drug has no effect if a woman is already pregnant. It works by blocking ovulation or fertilization.

I thought it blocked a developing child/embryo from implantation into the womb? Hence it is an abortifacient? Can some FReeper confirm?

7 posted on 05/08/2006 9:55:27 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
"We want women to be prepared, well before a contraceptive failure or unprotected sex occurs

As if we are talking some sort of car accident or industrial failure...

8 posted on 05/08/2006 9:55:32 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

I read a journal article studying it and indicating the key mechanism is delay or prevention of ovulation, although the efficacy indicates another mechanism such as prevention of fertilization or possibly implantation may be involved as well.


9 posted on 05/08/2006 9:56:57 AM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Good point. let's face it, any oral contraceptive is playing with hormones and it's no concidence that women who've taken the pill have a higher incidence of cystic mastitis.


10 posted on 05/08/2006 9:57:36 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Remember the 6 P's....proper planning prevents p*ssed poor performance. If people control their behavior, such a thing wouldn't be necessary. Me thinks this was suggested by some drug company.


11 posted on 05/08/2006 9:57:51 AM PDT by Ptaz (Take Personal Responsibility--it's not fun, but it's the right thing to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahayes; agere_contra
although the efficacy indicates another mechanism such as prevention of fertilization or possibly implantation may be involved as well.

Hence: abortificant.

12 posted on 05/08/2006 9:59:21 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

I read that line and thought, "Do they want to be prepared, or just take the shirking of responsibility for their actions to a whole new level?"


13 posted on 05/08/2006 10:00:33 AM PDT by delphirogatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ptaz
"Me thinks this was suggested by some drug company."

I will bet the ranch they have their finger in this pie.

14 posted on 05/08/2006 10:01:05 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

'Morning after pill' is a nice way to put the process. Isn't it actually three pills, an at-home passing of the baby through the vagina, the collection of the body, and at least one more office visit?


15 posted on 05/08/2006 10:03:47 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

""We want women to be prepared, well before a contraceptive failure or unprotected sex occurs. Afterward may be too late," said Dr. Michael Mennuti, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists."

In other words, we want to be sure people can murder babies at anytime, especially before they see the light of day.

What a sick jerk.....


16 posted on 05/08/2006 10:04:35 AM PDT by scottdeus12 (Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
The earlier it's taken, the more effective it is. But it can be hard to find a doctor to write a prescription in time, especially on weekends and holidays.

These "accidents" seem to happen an inordinate amount of times during these dates...and I'm pretty sure more beer, liquor, and drugs are consumed during these dates as well...I'm sure it is just total coincidence...-sarc

17 posted on 05/08/2006 10:05:20 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay

No, you're confusing emergency contraception with chemical abortion.


18 posted on 05/08/2006 10:16:43 AM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Not necessarily, and definitely not most of the time.


19 posted on 05/08/2006 10:17:22 AM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
'Morning after pill' is a nice way to put the process. Isn't it actually three pills, an at-home passing of the baby through the vagina, the collection of the body, and at least one more office visit?

No. You are confusing this with chemical abortion during pregnancy. This article is about a 'morning after' pill.

The drug has no effect if a woman is already pregnant. It works by blocking ovulation or fertilization.

20 posted on 05/08/2006 10:18:38 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson