Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republicanprofessor; Beelzebubba
This is art:


This is not:

At least in terms of post-modern abstract art ... ;-)

I'm still trying to figure this one - "fraught" with what? This guy needs an editor.

"Eventually, he decided instead to donate the paintings to Tate.

This transaction was also to prove fraught, for Rothko, despite, or, as is more likely, because of the great critical and commercial success that had come to him in the 1950s, tended to detect slights and veiled insults at every turn."

134 posted on 05/11/2006 2:14:21 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tunehead54
I'm thrilled that you like Kandinsky; perhaps you could see Rothko as an extremely simple reduction of some of Kandinsky's ideas.

I don't know if you are interested or not, but I just posted a new "lecture" on Romanticism that has some references to Rothko.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1630734/posts?page=3

It occured to me that Rothko may be the last derivation from the nineteenth century Romantics like Friedrich and Turner. So check it out if you wish.

135 posted on 05/11/2006 3:13:31 PM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson