Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion
"So the real question is, should you taser someone who's verging on unconsciousness?"

As opposed to what, shooting them with a gun? Yes.

Sounds like the OPTION to do so was police policy. I've watched people on COPS who were "dazed, catatonic and nonresponsive" fly into a rage when confronted.

You're a great Monday morning quarterback. How was the cop supposed to know she wasn't drunk, on drugs, suicidal, or just plain whack-o?

92 posted on 05/07/2006 3:03:45 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
As opposed to what, shooting them with a gun? Yes.

Yeah. The only ootions were shooting her or tasering her. Sheesh.

Sounds like the OPTION to do so was police policy.

It does? According to the article, the department did not return calls inquiring about the incident. If you have some other information, feel free to share it. Until you do, I'll assume you made that up.

I've watched people on COPS who were "dazed, catatonic and nonresponsive" fly into a rage when confronted. You're a great Monday morning quarterback.

You get all your information from TV shows? Well, I've watched Law & Order, and this seems inappropriate to me.

How was the cop supposed to know she wasn't drunk, on drugs, suicidal, or just plain whack-o?

And even if she were those things, would it be appropriate to taser a virtually unconscious person? That's the question to be answered here.

100 posted on 05/07/2006 3:12:52 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
Sounds like the OPTION to do so was police policy. I've watched people on COPS who were "dazed, catatonic and nonresponsive" fly into a rage when confronted.

You base your judgment on TV shows???? ROTFLMAO!

160 posted on 05/07/2006 5:01:55 PM PDT by ContraryMary (New Jersey -- Superfund cleanup capital of the U.S.A.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
As opposed to what, shooting them with a gun?

How about seeing if they need assistance first? I can't believe that you think shooting someone for not responding to a verbal command is acceptable. What did police do before there were tasers? They damn well didn't go around shooting anyone who was "nonresponsive".

182 posted on 05/07/2006 5:46:34 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
You're a great Monday morning quarterback. How was the cop supposed to know she wasn't drunk, on drugs, suicidal, or just plain whack-o?

You could say the same about an random person on the street, but that is no reason to go around randomly tasering people.

183 posted on 05/07/2006 5:48:32 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
As opposed to what, shooting them with a gun? Yes.

Sounds like the OPTION to do so was police policy. I've watched people on COPS who were "dazed, catatonic and nonresponsive" fly into a rage when confronted.

You're a great Monday morning quarterback. How was the cop supposed to know she wasn't drunk, on drugs, suicidal, or just plain whack-o?

I dealt with exactly this type of subject -- and much worse -- routinely for 15 years. This use of force, as described, was far from reasonable. In fact, it was idiotic.

There is no excuse. If it was policy, then my humanity would not allow me to work for such an idiotic administration. People who would blindly follow such policy should reexamine their humanity.

236 posted on 05/10/2006 7:29:39 PM PDT by Ghengis (Alexander was a wuss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson