Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: true_blue_texican
His "space" achievement is comparable to the first Mercury flight...not Apollo. Mercury funding was not that great and the government had not yet fully committed to the project. Even compared to Gemini, Mercury was extremely primitive and cheap.
45 posted on 05/04/2006 8:45:50 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: CWOJackson

Primitive, yes; but I'm certain not anywhere near on the cheap as SpaceShip One.


47 posted on 05/04/2006 8:48:46 PM PDT by true_blue_texican (grateful texan! slightly wasted, tonight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: CWOJackson
Mercury funding was not that great and the government had not yet fully committed to the project.

I guess 10+ years and Billions of dollars spent on military missile development didn't give the Mercury guys much of a head start?

SS1 was multiples of factors of safety better than Mercury. NASA calculated that Al Shepard had about a 50/50 chance of surviving the launch. Rutan built in many more graceful failure modes into SS1 than any NASA vehicles have ever had.

69 posted on 05/04/2006 10:57:48 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: CWOJackson

A ballistic rocket with a pod on top versus a controllable AIRCRAFT FLOWN by a pilot! Sounds the same to me!! (NOT)


81 posted on 05/05/2006 11:39:28 AM PDT by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson