Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWOJackson
Mercury funding was not that great and the government had not yet fully committed to the project.

I guess 10+ years and Billions of dollars spent on military missile development didn't give the Mercury guys much of a head start?

SS1 was multiples of factors of safety better than Mercury. NASA calculated that Al Shepard had about a 50/50 chance of surviving the launch. Rutan built in many more graceful failure modes into SS1 than any NASA vehicles have ever had.

69 posted on 05/04/2006 10:57:48 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: anymouse

Again, Rutan had the luxury of technology and composites that already exist...much of it from the efforts within NASA. In a way, NASA paid for much of his work.


70 posted on 05/04/2006 11:01:36 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson