Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fixing U.S. Intelligence (Negroponte-leading a revolution in intelligence)
Military.com ^ | Peter Brookes

Posted on 05/04/2006 3:38:37 AM PDT by IrishMike

Last Thursday, Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte, had a chance to appease his growing chorus of critics. He failed.

The crowd for the speech at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., expected the DNI to mark the end of his first year in office by regaling listeners with dazzling stories of cloak-and-dagger successes on the battlefields of Iraq, or in the shadows of the War on Terror. Instead, he lulled them to sleep with fusty tales of management and bureaucratic triumph.

The best Negroponte could muster was a detail-less anecdote about how he, in his role as the new intelligence czar, had made an critical decision that broke an impasse over the future of the nation's spy satellite architecture.

Some pundits seized the opportunity to wield Negroponte as the latest political-appointee truncheon with which to pummel President Bush. In fact, though, the speech shows that he's kept his eye on the fusty bureaucratic ball. That's his job.

The problem is not that Negroponte is failing. In fact, the DNI is doing a good job in serving as the president's primary intelligence adviser, while undertaking what President Bush called "the most dramatic reform of our nation's intelligence capabilities" since 1947.

(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: intelligence; spying; terrorism; watonterror; wot
Article continues:

Our expectations are wildly excessive. In fact, the DNI is not supposed to be the reincarnation of "Wild Bill" Donovan, founder of the heralded WW II Office of Strategic Services.

Negroponte's job is, let us just say, a bit more mundane. The mission of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) mission is pretty unexciting: Manage the intelligence budget, ensure coordination and information-sharing among the intelligence community's (IC) agencies to provide the best intelligence available to policymakers.

It's no small task. Leading and managing an intelligence community with a $40 billion budget, and 100,000 people -- both civilian and military -- across 16 federal departments would be a Herculean project anytime. Doing it while implementing sorely-needed reform -- and at war -- is a nightmare.

As Negroponte put it in his recent speech, "We are in the process of remaking a loose confederation [of intelligence agencies] into a unified enterprise. This will take time -- certainly more than a year -- but with the right approach, it can be done."

And despite the volley of raspberries, Negroponte is making progress. As critical as some in Congress have been, the House Intelligence Authorization bill noted: "The effort by the DNI to create an intelligence community that is greater than the sum of its parts is beginning to bear fruit." Communications: One of the failings that led to 9/11 was the lack of communications between the intelligence and law enforcement communities, particularly the CIA and FBI. Today, information flow between agencies on intelligence matters has drastically improved (but, undoubtedly, not enough). In addition, during the DNI's tenure, the FBI finally merged their counterintelligence and counterterrorism divisions with their directorate of intelligence analysis into an integrated National Security Branch. Hallelujah!

Focus: The U.S. government (rightly) sees terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, Iran , Iraq , North Korea and China as the country's top-tier intelligence priorities -- thus needing laser-like attention.

To meet this challenge, Negroponte strengthened the counterterrorism center and established a counterproliferation center. He also set up North Korea , Iran , China and Iraq "mission managers" to improve interagency collection/analytical work against these "hard targets."

1 posted on 05/04/2006 3:38:40 AM PDT by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Everyone knows the game. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.


2 posted on 05/04/2006 3:52:14 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

National Intelligence = oxymoron

There are those that make things happen, there are those that watch things happen, and there are those that don't know what the hell happened.

I still think we're hanging out in the third category.


3 posted on 05/04/2006 3:53:37 AM PDT by MedicalMess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
One of the failings that led to 9/11 was the lack of communications between the intelligence and law enforcement communities, particularly the CIA and FBI.

That sentence would be better if "One of" was removed and the sentence started at "The failings that."
4 posted on 05/04/2006 5:49:11 AM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
Negroponte wants a life after as well as most of these political appointees, that means they won't burn any bridges already built to nowhere.

Negroponte tooooook his own sweet time in releasing that warehouse filled with documents collected in Saddam's Iraq and it took the President demanding it on national news to free them.
5 posted on 05/04/2006 5:55:35 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
I do NOT trust him at all either.

Refusing to release those Saddam docs because "they were irrelevant" as he said, for 2 years, while the MSM and dems create this myth that Saddam would have never worked with terrorists, and that AlQueda was never in Iraq and Iraq has nothing to do with the WoT until we made it that way, blah blah blah.

ALL blown out of the water with that info, and Negroponte kept it hidden for all that time, on his own, in direct contradiction of what Bush was telling him for months and months.

At best its incompetence (or blindness to how it all affects Bush), at worst he is an outright enemy.
6 posted on 05/06/2006 6:24:22 AM PDT by FreedomNeocon (Better to take what they can throw at us now,rather than take what they promise to throw at us later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon

Really hard to tell some days who the worst enemy is and there sure is NOT a united front in WDC put forth in letting the world know that uncivilized lunacy is NOT acceptable.


7 posted on 05/06/2006 6:39:06 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson