[trashcanbred]

All of them can work under this assumption. It is merely a backdrop, just as no author of a book needs to have his name mentioned in every sentence.

You said all of them did work... not can

Don't you think you should ask the scientists who study in those fields if they agree first?

[trashcanbred]

By the way since ID isn't faith based... how come only "one" Intelligent Designer? What proof is there that there is only one? Why not two? Why not 42??

[Fester Chugabrew]

Sheez. Yes. I used the past tense. Ever heard of Isaac Newton? Galileo? Far be it from me to suggest intelligent design must serve as a recognized backdrop in order for science to happen. Far be it from you to allow intelligent design into any public academic, scientific context. Indeed, you'd like to use force of law to prevent it.