Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Prices Fall(Surprise inventory build)
money.cnn.com ^ | staff

Posted on 05/03/2006 7:38:25 AM PDT by kellynla

Oil prices fall on surprise inventory build. Gasoline inventories rise 2.1 million barrels. Crude oil stocks up 1.7 million barrels.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: energy; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-208 next last
To: blu

This just in:

"Gay week at Disney World causes high demand for petroleum jelly. Crude prices rose 42 cents to $76.48 on the news."


161 posted on 05/03/2006 10:13:47 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander

The question is how much do these shadowy futres market people make? The example I gave was the Saudi's producing a barrel of crude for six bucks and selling it for $75.00.

Who rakes in the difference between cost and artificially raised market price?


162 posted on 05/03/2006 10:20:12 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
It's sad when I see gas at $2.67 (Spartanburg, South Carolina, home of the consistently cheapest gas I've ever seen)...

Wetumpka, Alabama was at $2.68 since last Thursday.... Now down to $2.55!

163 posted on 05/03/2006 10:24:10 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
The question is how much do these shadowy futres market people make? The example I gave was the Saudi's producing a barrel of crude for six bucks and selling it for $75.00.

You too can be one of the shadowy market traders. Just contact your broker and buy some options.

How much it costs to produce has very little to do with it. Go to your local theatre and buy some popcorn and a Coke. They will probably make more off you than those evil Saudis ever will.

164 posted on 05/03/2006 10:25:08 AM PDT by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander

"How much it costs to produce has very little to do with it"

Yes it does...the entire industry is claiming a small percentage of profit citing Crude at $74 a barrel being a "Cost". If in reality the "cost" is $10 and $64 is an additional level of profit, they are being deceitful by not addressing the additional, massive profit.

There's nothing wrong with making money hand over fist...just be honest about it.


Now... who gets the delta between the cost and price of crude?

The producer?, the trader? the oil companies?


165 posted on 05/03/2006 10:38:23 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg

Thanks.


166 posted on 05/03/2006 10:42:07 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Politicians and the U.S. Government are liars, cheats and thieves, in it for their own gain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
Now... who gets the delta between the cost and price of crude? The producer?, the trader? the oil companies?

All of the above. You can too if you buy some oil futures. Or you may lose just like the other futures traders.

Do you think it costs the gold miners $600/oz to mine gold? Do you think it costs Coke $6/gal to make Coke?

Sure the Saudis could sell their oil for $1/bll and lose money if they wished. Or they can sell it on the free market and get whatever the seller is willing to pay. Apparently Exxon is willing to pay them $70 and refine it into gas and make a profit. Just like Kelloggs buys that corn at $2-$3/bushel and sells you corn flakes at $2-$3/ box.

167 posted on 05/03/2006 10:46:12 AM PDT by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
But two or three key entities can withhold key information and use that to manipulate the futures markets.

Can you tell us what two or three entities control a large enough percentage of refined product to drive price?

168 posted on 05/03/2006 10:46:22 AM PDT by Ditto (People who fail to secure jobs as fence posts go into journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Can you tell us what two or three entities control a large enough percentage of refined product to drive price?

Try controlling the information, not just the product. In a tight market, it can be the difference between the perception that inventories are shrinking versus inventories are increasing.

169 posted on 05/03/2006 10:49:02 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I've answered 3 of your questions already without any thanks...



Thanks {;O)


170 posted on 05/03/2006 10:51:33 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (It wasn't the spikes that kept Him on the cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
why did gasoline inventories RISE 2.1 million barrels when analysts thought they would DECLINE 700,000 barrels? That's means the analysts were 2.8 MILLION BARRELLS off in their estimates - or about 33 percent of daily gasoline consumption. In other words, over the course of one week, refineries would have to have produced about five percent more gasoline each day than was being used

Not necessarily. Perhaps people are driving less and the reduced purchase of gasoline by retail customers affected the stocks in the supply chain. That's not as much fun as assuming a vast oil conspiracy, but far more likely.

171 posted on 05/03/2006 10:53:01 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You said -- "But ... but ... but ... I thought there was a severe SHORTAGE of gasoline. What gives?"

Shortage comes from two factors supply and demand (actual buying demand). So, the forecasted shortage comes from running the refineries at capacity (give or take a few going offline and/or coming online) -- plus the normal buying patterns for gasoline.

Now, as prices go up, there should be a pattern developing that shows usage going down. However, I don't think that's been as prevalent a pattern as it could have been. It appears that many people were driving just as much as before prices went up and simply "biting the bullet" on the prices.

HOWEVER, it also appears now -- that a significant number of people may have reached a "breaking point" and have cut back drastically, reducing their driving to essentials and/or modifying their driving to combine several things in one trip.

This appears to have happened like a rubber band "snapping" after it's stretched too far. I think the buying public just *snapped*.

So, a lot of people drastically cutting back would throw the forecasters for a loop -- because the buying public has maintained their "drunken binge" on gasoline -- and the forecasters were depending on that.

Well, the drunken public is getting a headache now -- hence -- they've cut back drastically.

Regards,
Star Traveler

P.S. -- I've heard from many different sources where people are making big cut-backs now. I know I've cut back my usage by 50% (from the last 6 months usage) by cutting back out-of-town trips that I was making. I'll wait until later and make a few less.


172 posted on 05/03/2006 10:55:48 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
You fell for it Dirtboy. The manipulation isn't on the part of Big Oil but the Media.

..."while closely watched gasoline inventories swelled by 2.1 million barrels..."

The average daily gasoline consumption in the US is roughly 320,500,000 gallons. A swelling of 2.1 million barrels or roughly 88 million gallons of gasoline only constitutes a quarter of our daily use. The media is trying to fool us into thinking there is a swelling of inventory when there isn't.

173 posted on 05/03/2006 10:57:02 AM PDT by Trinity5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
Not necessarily. Perhaps people are driving less and the reduced purchase of gasoline by retail customers affected the stocks in the supply chain. That's not as much fun as assuming a vast oil conspiracy, but far more likely.

First of all, analysts already factor that in. Second, the price dropped slightly last week. Third, use would have had to have dropped about five percent in one week - that's a lot.

I don't even see it as a conspiracy theory. I think we are seeing some traders in a tight market tweaking information to shift perceptions to where a shortage is present where there may not be one. That's as old as trading in such situations. But it still is not market forces working on accurate information.

174 posted on 05/03/2006 10:57:13 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Try controlling the information, not just the product.

Since hundredes of individual entities all report their inventories into one central point, are you accusing the DoE Energy Information Administration of cooking the books?

And what makes you assume that the 5% change in inventory must show a conspiracy? You do understqand that there are two components to inventory -- production and demand. Have you considered that $3+ pump prices can and has depressed demand?

175 posted on 05/03/2006 10:57:38 AM PDT by Ditto (People who fail to secure jobs as fence posts go into journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
the entire industry is claiming a small percentage of profit citing Crude at $74 a barrel being a "Cost".

Depends on what industry you are talking about. Production companies (and national oil companies in OPEC countries) sell crude. Refiners buy crude and make gasolin (and other products). Retail marketers sell gasoline to peeps. Tranportation & Distribution firms move it all. There are varying degrees of integration in the industry.

In other words,, there isn't one simple answer to the question.

176 posted on 05/03/2006 10:58:24 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Trinity5
The average daily gasoline consumption in the US is roughly 320,500,000 gallons. A swelling of 2.1 million barrels or roughly 88 million gallons of gasoline only constitutes a quarter of our daily use.

Once again, industry analysts predicted a drop. And it rose. And for the inventory to rise that much, it means that there was a fair amount of excess refining capacity that was not expected.

177 posted on 05/03/2006 10:58:54 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Since hundredes of individual entities all report their inventories into one central point, are you accusing the DoE Energy Information Administration of cooking the books?

No, I am saying that making minor adjustments to the reporting of inventory levels by a few players can be used to manipulate a tight market.

And what makes you assume that the 5% change in inventory must show a conspiracy? You do understqand that there are two components to inventory -- production and demand. Have you considered that $3+ pump prices can and has depressed demand?

Have you considered that industry analysts probably have fairly sophisticated models to track price versus demand? And it isn't like we didn't hit this price before - it was higher during Katrina, so they have some experience modelling this level. And they were still off by a fair margin.

178 posted on 05/03/2006 11:00:57 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You asked -- "Why where they off 2.8 million barrels in one week?"

The buying public was on a "drunken binge" of buying gasoline, far beyond what their budgets would allow. It went up and then back down (a few more swings in between) -- and then, now -- back up big-time.

Well, it's like a rubber band -- it got stretched too tight and it *popped*. People cut back drastically.

Now, there is "pent-up demand" in the buying public -- if they manage to go on another drunken binge again and get *desentized* to the new higher prices (which may happen). But, for now -- they cut back big-time. This is *OBVIOUS* that the public did that -- by the numbers which are shown. The numbers tell it. The public *CUT BACK* big time.

So, if the prices dropp a little and the pent-up demand kicks in again, the inventories will swing drastically the other way, too.

We'll see...

Regards,
Star Traveler


179 posted on 05/03/2006 11:02:41 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You said -- "Once again, please come up with a rational explanation of how the analysts can be so far off as to inventory levels for gasoline in the course of one week."

Well, the analysts thought they were still dealing with a "drunk". But, the buying public came off their "drunken binge" and started sobering up. And it was a "jolt". They quit buying.

Now, the analysts are going to have to factor in more "sober" drivers.

Regards,
Star Travelers


180 posted on 05/03/2006 11:05:03 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson