Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Column on oppression of women enrages readers (LEFTY COLUMNIST RESPONDS TO FREEREPUBLIC "RAGE")
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | May 3, 2006 | JENNIFER HUNTER

Posted on 05/03/2006 5:56:58 AM PDT by Chi-townChief

The art of political conversation in this country is disappearing. As journalist and wise man Russell Baker notes in the May 11 New York Review of Books, the polarized nature of our politics has led to a situation where "sensible folk scarcely dare speak on any subject more arresting than food and weather for fear of igniting some human powder keg in a conversation-ending spew of rage."

I felt that spew of rage after my column last week on the plight of Muslim women abroad who are routinely beaten by their husbands and denied basic freedoms such as the right to drive a car. I mentioned at the end of my column that President Bush, the putative champion of democracy, has failed to address the issue of women's rights with our Saudi and Pakistani allies -- and he didn't talk about it last week when the president of Azerbaijan visited, either. Bush feels no compunction about lecturing Chinese President Hu Jintao on religious freedoms and human rights. He can decry Russia's withdrawal from democracy, but take to task the oil-rich Saudis -- heck no.

Did many of my readers try and have a polite conversation with me about it? A few; most spewed. Here are some of the more polite responses:

As much as the left/progressives/socialists/communists (or whatever you want to call yourselves) scream, it comes down to this ... either you fight the Islamofascists or go buy yourself a burka.

Toni

Your article claimed Bush wasn't vocal in lobbying for women's rights. From what I can tell, no women's rights groups came forward either. Maybe that is because they are leftist groups instead of women's groups.

Rosey

I agreed with everything in your column until the gratuitous jab at President Bush. Please name a politician who's had the courage to criticize our Islamic oil suppliers for their treatment of women? This isn't a Bush trait but a world malady.

Ron

While we live in a country that still has freedom of the press and the right to petition our government, maybe you should forward your article to the White House and see what the response would be. I am quite sure they wouldn't come for you and cut out your tongue, because after all, we all are entitled to our opinions. In fact I am certain you would get a speedy response.

Sue

This article without a doubt is one of the best that I have read to fearlessly address, head-on, the manner in which the oppression of women is ignored not only by male leaders in the Arab world, but the manner in which the majority of male leaders in the United States have chosen to generally remain silent. ...

Mary

He [President Bush] owes his allegiance to the religious right of this country. He couldn't care less about the rights of women in Saudi Arabia or anywhere else in the Middle East. He is this moral and just man ordained by God to make sure that women are put in their proper place in this world. ...

Mike

So instead of going after Islam, you "bravely" take on President Bush. Hey Jennifer -- put your burka on.

Bob

What sense would that make, Bob? Would my donning a burka give freedoms to Muslim women? It would merely imprison me. Unless that's your goal -- to shut me up. To that I say, never!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dinosaurmedia; freerepublic; kneejerk; linerals; msm; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Man, it just keeps getting funnier; evidently, Ms. Hunter or one of her lackeys is a lurker takes some liberties with our responses as well.

Here's the original thread:

Saudi official ignores women's issues (SO, OF COURSE, COLUMNIST BLAMES PRESIDENT BUSH)

1 posted on 05/03/2006 5:57:00 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice; Augie76; Barnacle; BeAllYouCanBe; BillyBoy; Bismarck; bourbon; cfrels; ...

CHICAGOLAND PING


2 posted on 05/03/2006 5:59:23 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
I mentioned at the end of my column that President Bush, the putative champion of democracy, has failed to address the issue of women's rights with our Saudi and Pakistani allies -- and he didn't talk about it last week when the president of Azerbaijan visited, either. Bush feels no compunction about lecturing Chinese President Hu Jintao on religious freedoms and human rights. He can decry Russia's withdrawal from democracy, but take to task the oil-rich Saudis -- heck no.

Clinton didn't respect woman at all, no matter where they lived, so what's this lefties point?

3 posted on 05/03/2006 6:02:33 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

What a stupid column. She clearly mistakes "polite disagreement" with "rage." If she wants to make a point about "rage," she ought to show some inflammatory responses.


4 posted on 05/03/2006 6:03:17 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Well Ms. Hunter, Bush, through American blood and treasure gave Iraqi women the right to vote.

Something no other Arab women have ever had. Giving them political power gives them the power to change their lives in the way they see fit.

What more has any American president ever done to free Arab women?


5 posted on 05/03/2006 6:05:51 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

"So instead of going after Islam, you "bravely" take on President Bush. Hey Jennifer -- put your burka on.

Bob

What sense would that make, Bob? Would my donning a burka give freedoms to Muslim women? It would merely imprison me. Unless that's your goal -- to shut me up. To that I say, never!"

What Bob had to say went completely over Ms. Hunter's head.


6 posted on 05/03/2006 6:06:59 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

I've been saying it for years: when it comes to real harm or repression for women....the feminists shrink back into the baseboards.

Bush bashing is just as automatic as breathing for ladies like Ms. Hunter.


7 posted on 05/03/2006 6:09:28 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (I care for my pets better than Vincente Fox cares for his own citizens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

Not only that, she combined two separate responses to set up a strawman to try to knock down.


8 posted on 05/03/2006 6:10:28 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
What Bob had to say went completely over Ms. Hunter's head.

Some burkhas are of the psychological variety.

9 posted on 05/03/2006 6:11:30 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (I care for my pets better than Vincente Fox cares for his own citizens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

If only President Bush could be more like Hillary and Nancy Pelosi....


10 posted on 05/03/2006 6:11:43 AM PDT by Drango (No electrons were harmed in this posting. Several however, were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Maybe she should commission a political cartoon with mohammed dressed in burka while he is being stoned for being raped to highlight the oppression experienced by the female followers of islam. I am sure that her male friends in the media will see to it that it is printed. Writing articles condeming Bush because islamomites are sexual deviants is in her view a brave and intelligent pursuit. Shoosh, where are the real intellectuals. The absence of brain power on the left is what has cast their entire movement on the rocks.


11 posted on 05/03/2006 6:13:53 AM PDT by tigtog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Where's the rage? All those responses were pretty polite.


12 posted on 05/03/2006 6:16:57 AM PDT by gate2wire (Derby related crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
If I could, I would post the responses to Michell Malkin's column on UCSC by the truly disgusting Lefties. Mrs. Malkin had to move her family after her personal information was posted on the Leftie sites.

The vile, racist, sexiest comments received by Mrs. Malkin would have the Bush-bashing Mz. Hunter on life support in an ICU somewhere. Once again, I urge anyone who reads these sorts of news columns to check the byline. There are far more Mz. Hunters, Maureen Dowds, Helen Thomas' in the news industry than most realize. If it is Leftie tripe, you can bet it is some poorly paid feminist wannabe, or else, a hyphen man/metrosexual who hasn't got the stones he was born with...the other half of the hyphen put those in her purse on the day of "commitment".
13 posted on 05/03/2006 6:17:00 AM PDT by ishabibble (UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Jennifer Hunter

14 posted on 05/03/2006 6:18:59 AM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
What a twit this female is - she's probably in the "no blood for oil" crowd, and most likely in the "the WOT is based on a lie and we have no business being there" crowd, yet she seems to think we should exert our might on a feminist issue that the average "feminist" refuses to actually attempt to do anything positive about. How ironic that a philandering "President" that took advantage of young women under him, and was accused of multiple cases of rape and other slights to the female world, is the hero of the "feminists" and could do no wrong, while a President that is faithful to his wife and never subjugated or took advantage of any poor females (or it would be front page news everyday)is castigated for not doing what they won't do and is actually expected to threaten military might for women's rights around the world, even though he should not free tens of millions of Human Beings from murderous dictators. It's incredible that a supposedly rational mind could have such idiotic ideas and world views...
15 posted on 05/03/2006 6:20:49 AM PDT by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

Hey, guess who has her own column now at the Sun-Times?

S. Jennifer Hunter.

Guess who S. Jennifer Hunter is?

Michael Miner at the Chicago Reader told us last year when Hunter joined the Sun-Times editorial board:


Jennifer Hunter, the former editor of North Shore magazine, has just been named to the Sun-Times editorial board. "It's a step down for her, having run the magazine successfully for almost three years," says her husband, John Cruickshank, publisher of the Sun-Time

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ericzorn/weblog/archives/2005/03/keeping_it_in_t.html


16 posted on 05/03/2006 6:21:08 AM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Actually..as a woman, I'd say this leftist is pretty sly. She championed our cause by getting the word out about Muslim abuse under the guise of a criticism toward the right.

Thanks girlfriend.

You are still on the wrong side tho. Come on over to the light. :)

17 posted on 05/03/2006 6:21:57 AM PDT by Earthdweller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Silly wench. Why doesn't she complain about Iran instead of our allies?


18 posted on 05/03/2006 6:22:39 AM PDT by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
She clearly mistakes "polite disagreement" with "rage."

It wasn't a mistake, it was a common leftist trick. She labels the comments rage, when they are mere challenges or disagreements to her position.

Liberals project a lot and this is an example. I'd be willing to bet that the one in a rage is actually Miss Jennifer.

19 posted on 05/03/2006 6:24:33 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Arrest Mary McCarthy!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

A reminder to Ms. Hunter....stupid is as stupid does, and it looks like you are really stuck on stupid. Hope you grow up sometime soon.


20 posted on 05/03/2006 6:24:45 AM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson