(Did you speak at my synagogue last Saturday?)
Let's get real here. As nutty as these people are, they didn't behead anyone, or even think about beheading anyone. Most of their co-religionists think that going into an Internet Cafe and destroying the property there is a crime. These folks will untimately find themselves in prison and probably be forced to make restitution to the owner of the Internet Cafe.
Now tell, me, what exactly is the similarity between these criminals and the Islamic Swine to which you compared them? Or do you also find similarities between Islamic Swine and some nut who damages a fur coat? Maybe you advocate the death penalty for every crime?
ML/NJ
You are right. They have not beheaded anyone. I think guns are the favored method to dispatch heathens whom they feel threatened by. Ultraorthonuts have killed jews, palestinians and others in the name of their religion, or perhaps you are unaware of massacres committed by religiously inspired haredi in Israel. Rabin would very likely be alive were it not for such virulent religious inspiration.
Also, I hope you would agree that their use of firebombs and rocks in Israel may yet produce fatalities amongst those brazen enough to hold in custody, a haredi child murder suspect or drive a car through their neighborhood on the sabbath.
One of the most distressing aspects is the silence of, and in some cases the support or instigation of their religious leadership- the rabbid rabbis. Anytime religious leaders do not condemn violent followers they should be shunned. Even worse, some of these nuts not only tacitly sanction such behavior - they incite their drones to perpetrate such acts.
No, I’m afraid the differences in the degree of violence are likely more a reflection of relative numbers: tens of thousands (ultraorthocrazies) vs a millions (muslimnuts). I have little doubt that they would be a much bigger problems were they a majority.