Posted on 05/02/2006 8:52:36 AM PDT by MNJohnnie
Listen to Rush on Line.
http://www.jasoncann.org/radio.htm
http://radio.findanisp.com/radio-shows-on-air.php
Thanks. I just finished reading it. Was just about to tell you "Never Miiiiind".
KFI Los Angeles cuts Rush short for commercials. They come in late and leave early.
---My buddy's Dad, a staunch Rep. would disagree with you vehemently. ---
I'm saying we were perfectly justified in dropping the nukes on Japan. It is the left that tries to saddle us with the charge of racism over that, and it is the left that will try to saddle us with the charge of racism when we try to close our border and evict the illegals. I reject their charges and further speculate that we are ready as a country to reject this guilt. Is that a little clearer?
"----she desperatley wanted to be an Olympic athlete. Just Hillaryous."
Isn't that about the 4th thing she has 'desperatley wanted to be'.
Sound a little disturbing (or disturbed) to me.
I believe that if today's Liberals in the main stream media were alive during WWII, we would have lost thousands more lives and quite possibly, the war itself. They would have given away the secret of D-Day, without a doubt.
Sorry, I misunderstood your post.
A walk down memory lane from 2003:
A Victory for White Guilt
WSJ Editorial Page ^ | June 26, 2003 | SHELBY STEELE
Posted on 06/27/2003 9:21:47 AM EDT by Matchett-PI
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/936594/posts
[snip]
Comments:
This decision says, "We agree that blacks are inherently and permanently inferior to whites." Wow.
4 posted on 06/27/2003 9:45:16 AM EDT by pabianice
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/936594/posts?page=4#4
*
I started a thread last night entitled: Why Do We Need States Anymore? By Rush Limbaugh. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com
Rush said this yesterday on his program [excerpted]:
.... "I got an e-mail from some wizard who thought he skewered me on one of my points and it's actually a great illustration of just how people don't understand how this stuff works.
He calls me a hypocrite and asks, "Why didn't you argue states' rights when the Supreme Court took away Florida's right to count its votes in November 2000?"
He thinks that I'm a hypocrite on this, but I'm being utterly consistent.
The Supreme Court of Florida had no right to rewrite Florida election law because no Supreme Court can create law.
There's no court that makes law, or is supposed to.
In the Florida decision, the U.S. Supreme Court correctly prevented the Florida Supreme Court from making law.
Let me ask you this: Do you think the Supreme Court had the power in the Dred Scott case to rule that slaves are property?
You know the official law of the land, according to the Supreme Court back in Dred Scott was that slaves were property.
Do you think the Supreme Court had the power to do that? I don't think they should have, but they did.
Do you think the Supreme Court had the power in Plessy vs. Ferguson to hold that separate but equal is equal?
I don't think so, but they did.
Dred Scott and Plessy were outrageous decisions, and they had to be fixed later on. ...."
Note the words, "..they had to be fixed later on."
For more insight, you may be interested in the thread I just started here, too:
2002: Justice Scalia's comments on constitutional interpretation
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/936601/posts
5 posted on 06/27/2003 9:52:07 AM EDT by Matchett-PI
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/936594/posts?page=5#5
Estimates were, from what I have heard, it could have cost us a million lives. The Japanese would have fought for ever inch of ground using gorilla warfare.
Holy crap! C-Span 2 is running Fidel Castro's May Day speech. WTH?
STFU YOU TEDDY, REID, NANCY, AND DURBIN.
Thanks, Johnnie.
Been lurkin'
I'm just thankful that we never had to find out the accuracy of those estimates. Otherwis, I might never have met this fine, gentle, soft-spoken man.
Thanks Rush! DNC/MSM talking point of the day.
Now I'm about to lose my lunch.
For 1400 years--actually until about 1922 with the Founding of the Arab Brotherhood in Egypt, the West and Islam had a coexistence. Muslims DO think they are superior, but in truth, all our religions, from Christianity to Judaism all think that we have the True Path to God. THe question is will we kill each other to get that way. I am not comfortable with the history of Islam; however, there are examples (e.g., Spain, Morocco, even Palestine between about 1490 and 1910) where Muslims and Westerners coexisted in peace. Perhaps they wanted us dead...I am a bit reluctant to declare my own jihad against 1.3 billion people in the world because of their religious BELIEFs. When it comes to the acts and goals of Islamo-Fascists, the situation is clear: kill the cockroach before the cockroach dirties your space. I don't see the same in all Muslims...
Hey Lee,
The author and Rush kept referring to "Total War". It has a specific meaning, and has had no application since WWII.
I agree, micromanaging the war, or sacrificing our troops to minimize collateral deaths is stupid. I think Bush, though, has given the field troops great leeway.
STFU MSM!!!
I left out HERO!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.