Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NOW WITH ACTIVE LINKS! SEE SELF-AGGRANDIZING CHACHKAS AT CLINTON "MUSEUM" STORE
clinton museum store ^ | 5.02.06 | Mia T (scoop by RichInOC)

Posted on 05/02/2006 7:12:27 AM PDT by Mia T

NOW WITH ACTIVE LINKS!

 

(just when you thought the clintons couldn't get any more shameless... or tacky....)
SELF-AGGRANDIZING CHACHKAS FOR SALE AT CLINTON "MUSEUM" STORE

by Mia T, 5.02.06

thanx to RichInOC for the scoop

 

READ MORE


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: alexisherman; bernardschwartz; bridgetonowhere; chinapolygroupcorp; chung; clintonmuseum; collui; craiglivingstone; davidchang; davidwang; doublewide; generalwuquanxu; haroldickes; hazeloleary; hillary06; hillary08; hoytzia; huang; irasockowitz; jamiegorelick; janehuang; josecabrera; josephlandon; kenhsui; keshizhan; lannydavis; leonapanetta; lippobank; lippogroup; liujuyuan; lynncutler; mariahsia; markmiddleton; marvinrosen; msmelindayee; nancyhernreich; nglapseng; noralum; raidy; robertmeyerhoff; rogertamraz; sisterping; slushfund; tedsioeng; theterrorismstupid; tongsunpark; trailerpark; trie; williammeddoff; williampeh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: JustPiper

thx.... you too :)


41 posted on 05/02/2006 8:56:24 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

This library slush-fund operation is one giant write-off. ;)


42 posted on 05/02/2006 8:58:34 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

keyword additions/bttt


43 posted on 05/02/2006 9:09:13 AM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
"I hear the place reeks of incense and has coin-operated private video booths..."

Good one.

That site is screaming for a parody.

44 posted on 05/02/2006 9:11:03 AM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Why do they miss him so, you might ask? Because they know it will be tough to see another Dem in the White House. In 40 years, they have not had a presidential candidate take 50.1% of the vote in any election.

(Jimmy Carter got 50.06% in 1976, and that was in the aftermath of Whitewater, Vietnam, and the height of the liberal activist hey-day. Clinton got 43.0% and 49.2%.)

That's 10 presidential elections, and (just barely) half the votes ONLY ONCE!!!!

What they really miss is having a viable third-party candidate like John Anderson or Ross Perot taking anti-establishment votes from the GOP. That's why they support McCain so heavily.

45 posted on 05/02/2006 10:37:48 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
PARDON ME!!!! It goes further back than that!

LBJ got 60.6% in the aftermath of the JFK assassination, but JFK himself only got 49.7%, and Truman got 49.8%.

You have to go back to FDR in 1944 to find the second Democrat who topped 50%... that's 60+ years!!!!

15 elections, and only twice did they break 50%... and one of those was by 0.06%.

Why does the GOP act like the minority party again????

46 posted on 05/02/2006 10:43:50 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

A third-party candidate attacking their left flank would be poetic justice.


47 posted on 05/02/2006 10:48:02 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee
That site is screaming for a parody. That site IS a parody. ;) A farce of a farce gilds the lily. methinks.
48 posted on 05/02/2006 12:28:36 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

No cigars?


49 posted on 05/02/2006 12:30:41 PM PDT by stylecouncilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee; Mia T
"That site is screaming for a parody."

I realize after viewing it, that this is a case where life imitates art (in this case, parody). It really needs no parody parallel site.


"Are you born to run? Head out on the Highway with the CPC leather jacket. This dark brown leather jacket is embossed with the Clinton Presidential Center on the back. Born in the USA! Our CPC jacket is made in the USA. "

50 posted on 05/02/2006 12:42:34 PM PDT by bwteim (Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Right!!!!


51 posted on 05/02/2006 12:44:28 PM PDT by bwteim (Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stylecouncilor

You're right. I'm shocked that they overlooked that.


52 posted on 05/02/2006 12:44:40 PM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bwteim

I agree. (see 48)

Who would wear that Jacket other than, perhaps, clinton?


53 posted on 05/02/2006 12:50:14 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

He still imagines himself as Elvis's long lost brother...


54 posted on 05/02/2006 12:58:03 PM PDT by bwteim (Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


55 posted on 05/02/2006 6:19:15 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Oh barf. I was afraid to go looking for fear of being soiled. I suppose he's selling thongs with his monogram...


56 posted on 05/02/2006 6:30:21 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Di'ver'si'ty (adj.): A compound word derived from the root words: division; perversion; adversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwteim
Guess I should have clicked on the link eh?
How sad is it that I believed they would actually sell that stuff?
57 posted on 05/03/2006 3:34:44 AM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee

As long as you're not buying
;)


58 posted on 05/03/2006 5:10:25 AM PDT by bwteim (Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

bttt


59 posted on 05/03/2006 6:33:16 AM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
So eat a bagel already. ;)

 
 
BAGEL
by Mia T
 

A Katz's delicatessen bump. 
(The best in New York City.) 
(Send  your boy in the Army a salami)
(It's a Jewish thang, ya wouldn't understand!)

dennisw

Me, I prefer a New York bagel, some nova and a (fat-free) schmeer. . .

The bagel's attenuation, BTW,
has nothing whatever to do with triangulation,
Safire notwithstanding.
(The clintons analogize not to the bagel's substance but to its
hole.)

The modern bagel is not trying to be a doughnut.
The doughnut-ization of the bagel is illusory.
The tough torus softened because of technology,
not demographics, or even demagogues. . .
It all boils down to boiling...
and, according to some bagel purists, New York water!

Real bagels are first boiled in a kettle,
then rinsed and cooled in a fresh water trough.
Only then are they baked.

The boiling process
reduces the starch and increases the gluten
to produce the real bagel's
characteristic leaden heft, golden brown thin crust and chewy center.

So-called bagel stores in recent years have skipped
this very important step.
They steam the bagels in a rack oven
producing the ubiquitous,
(and quite-by-accident doughnut-esque),
ersatz bagel.

Why this happened:
Real-bagel makers are dying off and taking their trade secrets with them.
Real-bagel making is more time- and labor-intensive.

Boiling reduces shelf-life...
Would that we had parboiled the co-presidents, too...

 
 

60 posted on 05/04/2006 7:05:42 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson