Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Energy Sec: US 'Off Oil' in 4 Years
Newsmax.com ^ | 5/1/06 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 05/01/2006 5:19:40 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe

Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said Sunday that the U.S. was just "three or four years" away from perfecting the process that would allow American motorists to fuel their vehicles with ethanol instead of gasoline.

Asked, "how long before you think that we will be off of oil and onto ethanol?," Bodman told NBC's "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert:

"We will be in a position over the next three or four years . . . where we will have designed the enzymes and we will be in a position that we can then start the conversion."

Bodman said that besides additional research, the U.S. would need to "build these [ethanol] plants all over America."

"[It's] going to be something that would not just be in the Midwest, but would be in the East Coast and the West Coast where these grasses are, are available," he said.

Bodman estimated that by 2025, ethanol production would replace about 20 percent of total U.S. gasoline consumption.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bodman; doe; energy; energyindependence; gas; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
I searched on the title and didn't see this posted elsewhere....

If we really are "3 or 4 years away" from energy independence, I don't think that will make any difference... because it will take 15? 20? 25? years to replace the American motor fleet -- not every citizen has the money to just dump the old car and buy a new one. Not to mention replacing the supply (i.e., gas station) infrastructure with whatever its replacement will be.

I don't doubt that American ingenuity can make a replacement automobile possible -- and, in fact, I do believe that it will spring from American ingenuity, not from some government program. I just see government (and enviro-whackos) getting in the way of making the transition happen.

1 posted on 05/01/2006 5:19:50 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Sounds like BS to me.


2 posted on 05/01/2006 5:21:10 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I'm in favor of increased ethanol, but that headline is more than a little misleading.


3 posted on 05/01/2006 5:21:27 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

What happens to the price of ethanol during a drought? Do we attack BIG CORN for gouging?


4 posted on 05/01/2006 5:23:00 AM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl
I'm in favor of increased ethanol, but that headline is more than a little misleading.

They must have misquoted what he said. Oil is used in more than just automobiles...and I can't see us converting to another fuel in its entirety in a few years. We do have ethanol plants going up like Starbucks all over the country and there will be a glut of that stuff soon unless we start using a lot of it...so who knows.
5 posted on 05/01/2006 5:25:10 AM PDT by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Let's see. The U.S. will be "off of" oil in four years, but non-ethanol gasoline consumption will be back up to 80% within twenty.


6 posted on 05/01/2006 5:25:50 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

2025? 20%? Not good enough. Gas prices will be astronomical by then even with the ethanol step. Indiana is already 10%, and it does absolutely nothing. We need to be totally energy independent by then. Our energy costs are unacceptable. We are heading for a market crash. We're maybe two extra cold winters from it.


7 posted on 05/01/2006 5:25:50 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe
I have a dream! I vision the day when oil producing countries have to face the fact their precious oil will no longer hold consumers hostage. Wonder how much they'll hate us then?
8 posted on 05/01/2006 5:26:18 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

No, we pass laws to prevent growing corn around Ted Kennedy's "compound"... Or anywhere else it might be seen...


9 posted on 05/01/2006 5:27:53 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

1. Methanol is a better deal than Ethanol, converts from wood and coal etc., and can run on standard gasoline engines. Methanol can also make all of the petroleum by-products.
2. Now can we FINALLY get rid of the sugar tariff so we can have honest to God sugar instead of High-Fructose-Corn-Syrup in our food and drink?
3. What will this do to overall crop prices as farmers convert fields to corn. Is it a good thing to have so much of our land growing one crop?


10 posted on 05/01/2006 5:28:02 AM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

He's talking about ceullulose-based ethanol - creating alcohol from plant stalks or grasses. And he says we're three to four years away from knowing how to build a plant.

Corn-based ethanol is a marginal product. Cellulose-based ethanol is a clear winner.


11 posted on 05/01/2006 5:28:30 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

That's hilarious!

Yes, the Gummint will investigate Big Corn for gouging and everyone will be issued 100 pounds of cornbread to sooth their anger.

Thanks for the laugh!


12 posted on 05/01/2006 5:29:21 AM PDT by navyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sittnick
I am with you on that. Let hope that high fructose corn syrup gets to be so expensive that food manufacturers will have to leave it out or go back to cane sugar.
13 posted on 05/01/2006 5:34:13 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

Some of this may be political noise-making for the benefit of our oil-producing trading partners in the Middle East: "We don't need your oil as badly as all that, so be nice."


14 posted on 05/01/2006 5:35:20 AM PDT by Fairview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

In four years all of the corn will be needed for tortillas. Then what will we do for ethanol?


15 posted on 05/01/2006 5:35:46 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe; Brilliant; P-40
If we really are "3 or 4 years away" from energy independence..

That is not what he said! It was: "We will be in a position over the next three or four years . . . where we will have designed the enzymes and we will be in a position that we can then start the conversion."

Then later, " Bodman estimated that by 2025, ethanol production would replace about 20 percent of total U.S. gasoline consumption."

16 posted on 05/01/2006 5:36:34 AM PDT by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

It's corny to think ethanol is going to entirely solve the dependence on oil.


17 posted on 05/01/2006 5:38:28 AM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The Tooth Fairy is good, too! And Cold Fusion and Perpetual Motion.


18 posted on 05/01/2006 5:39:17 AM PDT by RoadTest (The wicked love darkness; but God's people love the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9
Do we attack BIG CORN for gouging?

Oh no,not the corn cartel!

19 posted on 05/01/2006 5:39:24 AM PDT by Uncle Meat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

I think I'll just move to a warm clime and buy a bicycle.


20 posted on 05/01/2006 5:39:36 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson