Posted on 04/30/2006 10:18:28 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
The chief justice of the California Supreme Court said the state's death penalty has become "dysfunctional" and blamed lawmakers for looking the other way as 650 condemned inmates idle on death row.
Ronald George said in an interview with The Associated Press that the Legislature's inability to adequately fund capital punishment has led to a de facto moratorium on executions in California.
"I think that there are many, many things in the eyes of legislators that have greater priority," said George, who marks his 10th anniversary as chief justice on Monday. "That's the problem. People want to have the death penalty, but they don't want to pay everything it costs to have it implemented in a judicious manner."
Although California has the nation's largest death row, there are no executions in sight as a federal judge considers whether the three-drug cocktail used to put inmates to death here is unconstitutionally cruel.
A formal death penalty moratorium proposed by some lawmakers failed to get out of an Assembly committee in January. The Legislature's only recent action has been to approve $223 million last year for a new and larger death row with 768 cells.
Lawmakers seem to want it both ways, George said. Like a majority of their constituents, they publicly support the death penalty. But their inactivity has contributed to the malaise that leaves death row inmates languishing for decades at San Quentin state prison.
"The system is very dysfunctional," said George, a 66-year-old Republican who was appointed in 1991 by former Gov. Pete Wilson and elected chief justice on May 1, 1996.
But while he pointed the finger at Sacramento, some lawmakers said George has done little to relieve the backlog.
"He's not said, 'It's going too slow, we need more money to speed it up,'" Assembly Budget Committee Chairman John Laird, D-Santa Cruz, said of George.
But others say George has a point.
"Everyone wants to say, 'I support the death penalty,' but they also say, 'It's OK to have a de facto moratorium,'" said Assemblyman Joe Nation, a Democrat from San Rafael who opposes capital punishment. "It's a boondoggle."
George would not say how much money he thinks is needed, but ticked off a wish list of programs he'd like to see funded.
He said the Supreme Court needs several new staff attorneys to process the capital cases, many of which involve thousands of pages of transcripts. He also wants lawmakers to increase hourly payments to lawyers handling capital appeals, as the condemned usually wait years before counsel is appointed.
Roughly one-fourth of death row inmates don't have a publicly appointed lawyer to challenge their conviction and sentence. One contributing factor is that California has some of the strictest qualifications for death penalty attorneys. But George said highly qualified attorneys are necessary to ensure the condemned are fairly represented.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's spokeswoman, Margita Thompson, said the governor strongly supports the death penalty and would be willing to entertain proposals to speed up executions.
"The governor would support ways to make the system more efficient and responsive to victims that would not jeopardize the integrity of the legal review process," Thompson said.
Since California voters reinstated capital punishment in 1978, 13 inmates have been put to death. Meanwhile, four times as many condemned prisoners have died of natural causes, suicide or murder. By comparison, Texas, the nation's most frequent executioner, has carried out at least 355 killings in roughly the same period.
Even if one of the 650 condemned inmates exhausted their state and federal appeals this year, they wouldn't be executed because the injection procedure is mired in litigation.
And there appears to be no hurry to resolve that dispute.
A series of federal court hearings on the matter had been scheduled to begin this week, but were put off until at least September as lawyers haggle over witnesses and other pretrial issues.
George said the involvement of the federal courts, where appeals can linger for years, has worsened the delays.
Senate Minority Leader Dick Ackerman, R-Fullerton, said the Legislature is controlled by Democrats, "and they don't like the death penalty."
He said both parties, however, "are more concerned with bigger issues than why it takes so long to execute somebody."
"I can see why George is frustrated," Ackerman said.
George said it's up to the people and their elected officials to decide whether or not they want to continue having a death penalty in California.
"This court has upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty," he said. "If California wants a death penalty, we need to ensure adequate funding so we don't have these terribly long delays that are a disservice to the administration of justice."
What's truly dysfunctional is swift justice. Executing old or middle aged men for crimes they committed in their 20s... outrageous !
Which emphasizes the ludicrous nature of George's argument. California literally spends millions keeping offenders alive well after their sentences should have been executed.
California's death sentence is not dysfunctional. Those charged with enforcing our laws are dysfunctional; starting with Ronald George.
At approximately $200K/yr/inmate for maintenance, executing about 200 in May would provide approximately $40M to defend the other 450. That's about $100K/yr/inmate for legal fees which should be adequate to support a government attorney.
It seems to me that the ACLU has finally succeeded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.