Posted on 04/29/2006 5:41:26 PM PDT by jmc1969
No.
You 're overqualified.
Screw that rag of a paper. I no longer even think of it as anything else but the loony Bush Bash Daily. NOT news by any means.
OMG. Maybe he can be Hillary's running mate huh?
HeeHee!!these guys are a hoot!!!http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:b-Wp5EcKGaQJ:209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1000696/posts+NYT+stalin+misunderstood&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=opera mash here for more!
Who is Batboy endorsing this year?
I would say it's a classic.
Yeah.. we misunderstood the rape rooms, the child prisons, the nerve gassings, the feeding of opponents in to wood chippers..
how could we be so insensitive?
You poke sand up a wildcat's butt, and when he turns on you in fury, you try to say, "I've quit.....let's call it off......I don't really want to fight...."
Good luck with that!
Uhhhh! Noooo!! They are trying to promote diversity......They have a building full of soiled, bus station retards! They are looking for a train station, nit-wit urinator, though......
I would rather go with the capitalist way of dealing with trash companies. You just need to have a little patience.
Yes he did indeed. He misunderstood because of the false sense of support he thought he had from all those "hire-a-mob" leftist nuts there were protesting the USA instead of the United Nations and Iraq before the war began. Instead of carrying signs saying "Open Up To The UN Inspectors".. there were signs that read "Bush, the Number One Terrorist".
They blame Bush for the War. As stupid as Saddam was... I have and always will blame the liberals for the Iraqi War. And deep down inside, I think they actually wanted it.
So the production of missiles in violation of U.N. mandated range limitations was Saddam's method of cooperating? Yeah, right.
Uh?
As I recall reading, Saddam did an eleventh-hour switcheroo, with our buddies the Russian's helping move the WMDs to Syria. Also remember the many delays in holding Saddam accountable by our chums in the U.N. Clearly, this is the polar opposite of trying "to cooperate".
However, my Freeper friends, rather than argue with the pitiful fiction in the NYT piece, let's look at the larger picture - - the objective of the NYT mendacity.
I suspect very strongly that the political officers at the NYT want further to weaken our President (and our country). By pretending that Saddam was trying to cooperate with the U.N., they may add another propaganda prop, but the big picture isn't Saddam, it's (and I can't think of a better word) subversion.
Tag Line Alpha
Democrats - - the party of blames, lies, accusations, and subversion. The once great party of Roosevelt now chooses Stalin.
.
The Slimes - a big player in the Culture of Treason.
You 're overqualified.
That's what my mom figured. I guess the fact that I drool wouldn't help...would it?
FMCDH(BITS)
I think that all of the murdered Kurds, Shiites, Iranians, and Kuwaitis understood him all too well.
Liberals are always very happy to stand up for the oppressed as long as they don't actually have to do anything.
NYT Blues:
Oh, Lord, it's hard to make payroll
When no one believes what you wrote
No matter how much it's perfumed
It still smells like a garbage dump goat
Those pit-bulls at Free Republic
Just love to ruin my day
Oh, Lord I know that I'm honest
But it just don't come out that way.
(Apologies to Mac Davis)
That's really good!
Thanks! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.