Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
Glancing through the comments, one can see that around 50% uphold Rahman’s execution because this is what the Sharia [Muslim law] says. For at least one out of four of these, the essential reason for the death penalty for apostates is: if conversion to another religion is allowed, this would be fitnah (sedition), it would prompt others to follow this path, and thus all would become Christians. To halt this trend, which is not considered “normal,” it is better to kill. The concept of “fitnah” is Koranic (mentioned more than 30 times in the Koran) and it often justifies violence.

All would become Christians? Father Samir's interpretation, or Muslim thought?

Mrs VS

4 posted on 04/29/2006 6:43:34 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VeritatisSplendor

One of the Afghani Imans said something to that effect.

If the Apsotate was deported, then many others would follow, so they could go to the West as well.


12 posted on 04/29/2006 7:39:11 AM PDT by Sometimes A River (Bush stifles speech to appease Chinese butchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor

It was God himself that chose to give man his free will to chose , and Islam tries to take this from any man. How can one not see that this is pure evil? To force a "religion" upon a man?


18 posted on 04/29/2006 8:25:14 AM PDT by tessalu (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor; NYer

http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?cid=1119503547222&pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaEAskTheScholar

tells about the official moslem position facing the apostasy (al-riddah).

whereas (in arabic):
http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%A8_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%A9

tells about the wars against apostates (Houroub al-riddah)and their causes, the first paragraph says:

"The 'riddah' wars took place immediatly after the death of Mohammed and were aimed at those arabs who retracted from the new faith of Islam. Remained faithful to the Caliph Abu-Bakr, only the tribes around Medinah, plus the inhabitants of Medinah, Mekkah and Ta'ef. The Caliph Abu-Bakr decided to fight all the retracted, and 'did not leave anyone' of them, despite the direct intercession of the fellows of the prophet to spare only those who did not abide by the 'zakat'...."

Apparently, were it not for this violent (sarcastically their "shock and awe")reaction in its first days, we would only read about Islam in specialized History books.


27 posted on 04/29/2006 11:48:21 AM PDT by Patrick_k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: VeritatisSplendor
All would become Christians? Father Samir's interpretation, or Muslim thought?

Christianity began in the east and predates Islam. Fr. Samir is considered an authority on Muslim Christian relations. It makes sense that Arabs would be drawn back to christianity.

28 posted on 04/29/2006 12:04:44 PM PDT by NYer (Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson