Prosecutor Weighs Charges Against Rove in Leak Case

NYT ^ | April 28, 2006 | ELISABETH BUMILLER and DAVID JOHNSTON

[Mike Darancette]

Bad RATS, No Fitzmas.

[Peach]

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1623446/posts

[Fielding]

Ah come on - this is the NY TIMES for pete's sake

The NYTimes walks like a politician, it quacks like a politician, it smells like a politician, and wants me to believe it is a news journal. I won't allow my parakeet to edit that rag.

[Purrcival]

You forgot Fitzter and St. Fitzrick's Day.

[Krodg]

You be funny, dude.

[Howlin]

No. He made a deal.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Not only that--his lawyer said the new information was favorable to Rove.

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

:-)

[Mo1]

Fitz is walking on thin ice

[Wolfstar]

Remember the Clinton precedent...

I sure do. "It depends on what the meaning of the word IS is." When I heard that I about fell out of my chair. Unfortunately, most of my fellow citizens just shrugged.

[shield]

Crapola....Rove's attorney read a statement and in that statement Fitz had said he hadn't decided if Rove would be charged or not. YUK...Fitz wants so bad to indict Rove.

[Krodg]

Please note: his actions in this "investigation" are enough to damn him in my opinion. But I am curious about otherwise.

Research, dude!!

[retMD]

But Rove's lawyer said yesterday that the prosecutor said Rove was not a target.

I'm not a lawyer, but from following this case I've learned a few things. A person who testifys to the Grand Jury can be one of three things: a witness, a subject, or a target. Only a witness is definitely in the clear. If I understand correctly, the letter declaring someone a target may not go out until shortly before an indictment. Karl Rove is considered a subject, so he could still become a target.

[goresalooza]

And Martin Luther Fitzking Day, and Fitzident's Day. Fitz isn't delivering on any holiday. He can kiss his dreams of AG or SCOTUS justice goodbye.

BUAAAAAAHAHAHHAHA