Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tell Congress "NO" on amnesty!
4/28/06 | Drew McKissick

Posted on 04/28/2006 12:49:58 PM PDT by Drew McKissick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Drew McKissick

We need to take Mexico's Article 33 word for word and make it an Amendment to the US Constitution.


21 posted on 04/28/2006 1:05:32 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew McKissick

Problem is this issue has long term implications, and congress has never been very good at seeing long term implications. Their past legislation proves this.


22 posted on 04/28/2006 1:06:22 PM PDT by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew McKissick
I left the Republican Party to establish the Patriot's Party.

I'm waiting for a good leader to emerge.

Simple platform......

Enforce all laws, especially those involving immigration.

Drill for oil wherever and whenever before China beats us to our own domestic reserves off shore.

Term limits for Congress.

Fair or flat tax.

Fast-track a Manhattan Poject/Apollo Moon Mission - like crash building program of new refineries and nuclear, solar, wind, tide and hydroelectric power plants.

Outlaw environmental terrorism and made it an equal to the War on Terror!

and a few others to be named later.

23 posted on 04/28/2006 1:07:09 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I'm a proud GRINGO......is Bill Clinton still the president?...Seems that way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin
Does anyone else see the boycott as an act of aggression by a foreign enemy?

I think a growing number of Americans see it that way.

Thank you Lord for sending the boycotts/protests. You have opened the eyes of those who refused to see.

24 posted on 04/28/2006 1:07:32 PM PDT by Razz Barry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

"Does anyone else see the boycott as an act of aggression by a foreign enemy?"
_________________________________

Of course, though I would add domestic enemies too...i.e. cpusa, answr, hollywood...the usual suspects.


25 posted on 04/28/2006 1:09:24 PM PDT by fizziwig (Democrats: so far off the path, so incredibly vicious, so sadly pathetic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Drew McKissick

People in amusement park lines should shout out "Who supports amnesty for immigrants?" Then, cut in front of whoever's got their hand up nearest the front of the line.


26 posted on 04/28/2006 1:10:08 PM PDT by polymuser (Losing, like flooding, brings rats to the surface.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Razz Barry

I wonder how long it will be before these protest marches turn into riots.


27 posted on 04/28/2006 1:11:00 PM PDT by BRITinUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
Wrong, there is no compromising America and Americans!

YES there will be a wall/fence built with or without Govt!

NO never amnesty to a bunch of miscreants!

Evil is as evil does and we have fought against all that is the illegal aliens and will continue that fight and win!

28 posted on 04/28/2006 1:11:08 PM PDT by stopem (To allow a bunch of third world country nationals to divide Americans is unconscionable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin
Does anyone else see the boycott as an act of aggression by a foreign enemy?

Insurgents?

29 posted on 04/28/2006 1:11:26 PM PDT by polymuser (Losing, like flooding, brings rats to the surface.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
I have no problem offering amnesty to every illegal immigrant currently in the country - as long as Congress also immediately starts construction of a border fence.

'every' might be a bit much, but I agree. It seems to be more and more coming to some kind of compromise with stepped up security plus amnesty for some portion of current illegals. Those advocating mass deportations are living in a fantasy land, assuming by 'mass' they mean millions. The bottom line issue is to what degree illegal immigrants are willing to adapt to US values (assimilate) and how much will they be just another grievance group out for what they can squeeze from the rest of the people paying taxes here.

30 posted on 04/28/2006 1:12:02 PM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

It's a socialist, liberal communist thing!


31 posted on 04/28/2006 1:13:02 PM PDT by stopem (To allow a bunch of third world country nationals to divide Americans is unconscionable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse

I'm against amnesty but if I weren't I'd add abolishing dual citizenship to your list.


32 posted on 04/28/2006 1:13:33 PM PDT by Razz Barry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Make two years military service a requirement for amnesty.


33 posted on 04/28/2006 1:13:59 PM PDT by polymuser (Losing, like flooding, brings rats to the surface.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

34 posted on 04/28/2006 1:15:45 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

You're either a party of one who needs a new name or you're this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Patriot_Party


35 posted on 04/28/2006 1:18:34 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Drew McKissick

BAck in 2000 I sent emails out to my senators. During the Bush/Gore campaign in 1999 many Somalis some who were here in the USA for less than 6 months took part in our presidencial elections. One man who was here less than six months knew American politics so well that he knew all the cabinet members of JFKs administration on up through Clinton. They told me that they received "voting cards" from the Clinton administration.

That's not all! This immigration problem gets more complex than is being mentioned. Right now we're focusing on illegals. But I think there is another group of what I call "semi-illegals". I lost track of this problem after Bush became President but near the end of the Clinton administration I learnt the following from Somalis here in Portland who trusted me for whatever reason. While we do get our share of Somali refugees here in the US, we are also getting many of Europe's share. I know several Somailis who lived in Italy, UK and other European nations. That's the country that gave them their assylum. From there they leave their wives at home and they bring one wife and kids to the US. (I suspect on paper they are coming from Somalia thus getting a second assylum here).
Here they work to support their wives and children who are in multiple countries.

All this information was passed on but the government pretty much ignored it.


36 posted on 04/28/2006 1:19:42 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nosofar
"The bottom line issue is to what degree illegal immigrants are willing to adapt to US values (assimilate) and how much will they be just another grievance group out for what they can squeeze from the rest of the people paying taxes here."

The recent (and coming) demonstrations should have answered that one. Even as illegal invaders they are demanding rights, in spanish, while waiving the flag of a foreign country.

Assimilation? They don't want no stinkin' assimilation.

37 posted on 04/28/2006 1:22:21 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

The only way D.C. is going to be forced to sit up and take notice is if these protests turn violent all across the country. They have only themselves to blame for creating this monster, allowing it to fester, and then permitting it to shut down our major cities week after week. I've complained about the borders, but if someone had told me our government would allow, post 9/11, a national security nightmare as this could become, I would say never.


38 posted on 04/28/2006 1:23:11 PM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin

"the boycott as an act of aggression by a foreign enemy
That's exactly what it is, and the conduct of the Mexican government is bellicose. Not to lecture, but notice that Mexico's Fox goes out of his way to say: "Oh, we don't approve of the Mexican legislators (traveling to LA to encourage their countrymen this Monday)" because if he did, that would be a de jure state action. Mexico has shrewdly given only de facto approval to those Mexicans who have invaded our country, so they can have it both ways.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_facto
The worst part of it all, our own President should have said a long time ago,
"This shall not stand" but instead says, "Bienvenidos Amigos!"


39 posted on 04/28/2006 1:25:07 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

If they continue with their mad plan to leave the borders open to invasion? We just might have to...


40 posted on 04/28/2006 1:26:55 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson