Hamad Mir - "Terrorists will Use Nukes in America if U.S. Bombs Iran!"

Terrorism Press COnference ^ | 4-28-06 | Bob J

[Bob J]

In a just concluded debate and press conference, author and FBI Consultant Paul Williams and Jeff Epstein of "America's Truth Forum" reveal they have been advised by Pakistani journalist and Bin Laden biographer Hamid Amir that Al-Qaeda will use smuggled nukes against the US if the US takes military action against Iran.

Amir established his credentials by correctly predicting that Egypt would be hit by terrorist action a full two weeks prior to the events of last week. Amir, a Pakistani journalist, has been in contact with high ranking Al-Qaeda officials for several years.

The debate (between Richard Miniter and Paul Williams) and press conference were webcast LIVE by Rightalk.com. Audio files of both events will be available for downloading by this afternoon.

[Bob J]

We don't need to eliminate all of Islam for the same reason we don't have to nuke the Vatican to fight the KKK.

[Southack]

"100 nukes? What are the chances they would get just one? One in 20? What if they were walked across the border in the desert region of Arizona or Texas? Who's going to catch those?"

100%. No nuke can penetrate our borders because we have ground-based, personnel based, and aerial radiation monitoring (and chemical sniffers).

This is why trucks are being stopped crossing our border that have as little radiation as is contained in ordinary Mexican potting soil. It's why carrying 12 bananas in a briefcase will get you stopped at our border...anywhere along the border.

Nukes are less mobile and more difficult to hide than are people, by the way.

We're even stopping ships at sea that give off radiation.

[elchrio]

That's like saying we could've let Shinto Japan go on under peace terms, or have Himler in charge after Hitler in peace terms there.

islam is incompatible with modern life.

[America's Resolve]

All the more reason to hit them now, FIRMLY.

Time to crush these vermin. Any damage to innocent iranians is simply collateral damage.

They should be taking these thugs on, even if it costs some of them their lives.

We did it. They need to do it too.

If these madmen get nukes, nobody in the world will be safe.

[cccp_hater]

"It's alreading bubbling over, it can not get any worse"

That is perhaps the most foolish statement I have ever heard. Rule #1 is it can always get worse.

[elchrio]

Yeah, it's a good thing nothing can get across the borders illegally. Thank God for that 100% rate!

[Bob J]

How does the arial radiation monitoring work?

[elchrio]

Not really, it can't get worse. Islam is as islam does. It's as bad as it'll get.

[Star Traveler]

You said -- "I would be willing to bet there are more jihadists in the D.C. area than in Detroit. Just because C.A.I.R. is headquartered here doesn't mean the area is seething with jihadists."

I'm taking that information from a former Muslim, who was a professor at some prestigious Islamic university in Cairo (said it was the most prestigious in the Islamic world). And he is now a Christian. I was attending his talk in Tulsa, OK a few weeks ago (he lives in Florida). His name is Dr. Gabriel (as in "education" not "physician"). I can't remember his first name.

He was the one who mentioned Detroit and said that it's a hotbed of Islamic fanatics and terrorists and you'll get the same types of ideas (from the Islamic community in Detroit) as you will in the Middle East (that you may have seen on TV).

So, I'm just taking it from a source that comes from the Islamic world, and is no longer in that world, but is a Christian now. Thank God for those who have become Christians and removed themselves from the Islamic world and have chosen to educate those of us in the U.S. who will listen.

Regards,
Star Traveler

[lormand]

I'm withya pal.

I will try and cover Central Texas.

[muawiyah]

Here's a clue for the terrorists and their running dog lackeys ~ we have enough warheads and missiles leftover from the Cold War to eliminate Islam, and its believers, from the face of the Earth, except for the sheikhs and their women who hang around in European casinos.

[elchrio]

I think we better modernize and prepare ourselves, if for no other reason than defense PR, that we have modern and ready to use nukes.

This 'left over from the cold war' stuff is probably being laughed at unfortunately.

[Bob J]

"Here's a clue for the terrorists and their running dog lackeys ~ we have enough warheads and missiles leftover from the Cold War to eliminate Islam, and its believers, from the face of the Earth..."

Exactly how many nuclear bombs would it take to kill 1.6 billion people?

[muawiyah]

Poor deluded fools thinking you'll get a better deal out of the Democrats.

Hey, those putzes would invite in even more Islamofascist nukes.

[elchrio]

About 4 Ohio class subs for the bulk.

[Star Traveler]

You said -- "Because you would turn the percentage of muslims that are on our side, (you see some of them actually hate these radical muslims) and one that just dont want to be involved against us too."

There are no "Muslims" that are on our side. They are practicing "Takiyya" (which is the Islamic religious permission to lie to your face). Every Muslim who has left that evil religion has made the point that there is *no moderate Musliim*. They are only Muslim or not. There is no such thing as a "hijacked religion". The problem *is* the religion of Islam. There is no such thing as a Muslim who is your friend -- the Koran forbids you to be friends with the enemy (anyone who is non-Muslim).

You're thinking like a Westerner and not like a Muslim. Listen to some of the Muslims who have left that religion and are *telling us* how they really think. They've got you *fooled* -- just like CAIR does...

Regards,
Star Traveler

[muawiyah]

Not as many as you imagine. First off the fusion devices are "tunable".

[cccp_hater]

"Not really, it can't get worse. Islam is as islam does. It's as bad as it'll get."

Imagine every islamic nation with nuclear weapons and you have proven yourself wrong.

[elchrio]

Well, I assume that's just how it is. In the near future. We need to consider them as a fully growing destructive force.

We don't seem to of course, lots of people think they can't do take us out, or won't.

A shame. I hope there's a decent afterlife, cause we're getting sold up the river bigtime.

[Southack]

"Again, look at the damn W33. It weighed 250lbs and was a pure U235 gun bomb with NO INITIATOR NEEDED! U235 has a half life in the billions of years, and doesn't emmit a lot of bad rads on its own. The only part that could go bad is the explosives to send the U235 plug down the barrel, and that can be replaced EASILY. This is not even a matter of debate!"

That's simply incorrect. All gun assemblies require triggers (e.g. berrylium or po-210). It is the trigger that acts as the bullet for the gun assembly. Fire the gun, then the bullet initiates the chain reaction because it is emitting neutrons. Neutrons collide with other neutrons in the Uranium, and the chain reaction begins.

But Uranium itself can not be used as a trigger material because it emits so few neutrons. Because it emits so few neutrons, it has a very, very long half-life. A long half-life makes it unsuitable to initiate a chain reaction, especially when traveling by or through an atomic core at bullet speeds.

You did get a single thing right above; it is true that the explosives do go bad...but so do the electronics..and so do the triggers...as does the booster over time.

Right now there is even an on-going debate at Los Alamos about whether our **pits** and cores may even go bad due to structural degradation over time. The precise shape and strength of the pit/core is critical (pun intended) too, after all.