Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamad Mir - "Terrorists will Use Nukes in America if U.S. Bombs Iran!"
Terrorism Press COnference ^ | 4-28-06 | Bob J

Posted on 04/28/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob J

In a just concluded debate and press conference, author and FBI Consultant Paul Williams and Jeff Epstein of "America's Truth Forum" reveal they have been advised by Pakistani journalist and Bin Laden biographer Hamid Amir that Al-Qaeda will use smuggled nukes against the US if the US takes military action against Iran.

Amir established his credentials by correctly predicting that Egypt would be hit by terrorist action a full two weeks prior to the events of last week. Amir, a Pakistani journalist, has been in contact with high ranking Al-Qaeda officials for several years.

The debate (between Richard Miniter and Paul Williams) and press conference were webcast LIVE by Rightalk.com. Audio files of both events will be available for downloading by this afternoon.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 4kooks; alqaedanukes; artbellstuff; globaljihad; hamadmir; iran; irannukes; iranstrikes; jihadinamerica; nukes; rightalk; terrorists; tinfoilhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 601-614 next last
To: Bob J

Go ahead bud - 45 minutes later the Middle East will be a smoking crater.


181 posted on 04/28/2006 10:29:31 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56

"Given that nuclear radiation is that detectable, and that we're looking for it, it would be an enormous risk for Al Qaida to leave smuggled weapons unused in the U.S."

Since 911. What if they were smuggled in before? What if they were walked across the border in the desert somewhere? What if they are sitting in a garage in Duluth?

Advocating that nukes *could not get across the border* is simply putting your head in the sand.


182 posted on 04/28/2006 10:30:37 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

I agree. and I'll say more, Until we stop treating this like a police operation and start treating it as a war, we are not going to win it. There are no " innocent civilians " in a war. We won ww2 in part because we nuked 2 Japanese cities, taking out a lot of non military persons. Some of these mid-east "civilians " are hiding and harboring some of the terrorists. Our civilians were attacked on 911, I personally believe in retaliation in like kind.


183 posted on 04/28/2006 10:30:51 AM PDT by Quickgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: michigander

May 1st?


184 posted on 04/28/2006 10:31:17 AM PDT by Barneysbiggestfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Do they think there will be anything left of their religion after our response?


185 posted on 04/28/2006 10:31:20 AM PDT by thoughtomator (That new ring around Uranus is courtesy of the IRS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
I actually was surprised that terrorists hadn't flown a plane into a building prior to 9/11. It always seemed to be a great terror weapon to me.
186 posted on 04/28/2006 10:31:59 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

I dont see how Right Whale or I are posturing that we not fight them. What we are pointing out is that if you destroy their religious sites you will make the problem worse.

There are 1.6 billion muslims on the planet. Lets focus on the sects that are radical.


187 posted on 04/28/2006 10:33:16 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

So you're saying Texans will respond to a nuke attack in Dallas by killing all the Muslims inside Texas? Hmmm.

What if the nuke attack is in New York or LA?


188 posted on 04/28/2006 10:33:21 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Of course. Official gov't searches is one thing, and they get about 5%. Even that should turn up 5 in 100 nukes. But unauthorized searches of everything go on all the time. Unless all these nukes just showed up this week, they have already been spotted, and not just 1 in 20 but 19 in 20.

Who would take a chance on shipping even one if the odds of discovery are so bad? All it would take is one discovery and this country would be turned upside down right now. The only serious chance they would have is to ignite it still aboard ship in the harbor. Coordinating even one would be a challenge, not to mention a number simultaneously, and it would have to simultaneous because there wouldn't be a second opportunity, ever.

189 posted on 04/28/2006 10:33:46 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

You said -- "If the same people who planned and carried out 9/11 had access to nuclear weapons...is there any doubt they would have used them? Hell, they wanted to kill upwards of 20,000 people, and might have if they hadn't miscalculated."

You're right -- they *planned* and then *carried out* the plan.

So, they're "planning" and they're going to "carry out" the plan.

No difference. Same thing...

Regards,
Star Traveler


190 posted on 04/28/2006 10:34:23 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Quickgun

"Some of these mid-east "civilians " are hiding and harboring some of the terrorists."

Some. Some.

Let's kill everyone...only way to be sure, right?


191 posted on 04/28/2006 10:34:55 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: elchrio

No doubt about it, you are a plant.


192 posted on 04/28/2006 10:35:05 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Tijeras_Slim

I think you are right. I just looked at his sign up date.

Thanks TS for pointed that out to me.


193 posted on 04/28/2006 10:36:58 AM PDT by CougarGA7 (There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: CougarGA7

1.2b, at most. The question is, do the rule us? Can they get away with endless atrocities?

We have to take a stand to rid islam off the planet. The best way is to prove their allah sites are fake.


194 posted on 04/28/2006 10:37:32 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Your logic fails to account for the possibility that *they just got them*, or will get them soon.

My logic also contains the idea that we should have kicked their a$$es yesterday.

195 posted on 04/28/2006 10:37:37 AM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Been there, done that. They need something more spectacular.


196 posted on 04/28/2006 10:38:18 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

It'll be ugly, trust me. I bet it'll be a mess up north too. People are going to rise up against islam.


197 posted on 04/28/2006 10:38:20 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

You said -- "What good does taking out their holy sites do? You think once we do that the one billion Muslims around the world are going to say, "I guess America was right and good after all"?

You have to understand their mentality. They *believe* in their symbols and how important they are to their "religion". If you destroy the symbols and show, by force, how weak and impotent their so-called god is -- they no longer will trust in that religion as "truth" and they will abandon it as ineffective and false.

They are the ones who "put stock" in these symbols. That's why they were intent on destroying *our symbols*. You see..., that's *their thinking* -- and not necessarily ours. So, they thought by destroying our "symbols" they would destroy us -- precisely because they know that is what would destroy them.

Regards,
Star Traveler


198 posted on 04/28/2006 10:38:32 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

A plant, such as anyone that's against islam is a plant? Was FDR a 'plant'? Was Truman? Was anyone that recognizes the enemy, and wants it to be dealt with, a 'plant' to you?


199 posted on 04/28/2006 10:40:28 AM PDT by elchrio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

100 nukes? What are the chances they would get just one? One in 20?

What if they were walked across the border in the desert region of Arizona or Texas? Who's going to catch those?


200 posted on 04/28/2006 10:40:54 AM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 601-614 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson