Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grassley wants drug czar fired
AP/crgazette ^ | 04/26/2006

Posted on 04/27/2006 11:31:21 AM PDT by ncountylee

DES MOINES, IA - Sen. Charles Grassley on Wednesday called for President Bush to fire the nation's drug czar, claiming more needs to be done to combat methamphetamine abuse.

John Walters, director of the White House Office of National Drug Policy, has been focusing too much on curbing marijuana use, said Grassley, R-Iowa.

Grassley said he wrote Walters calling for more action on meth and the response he received was "basically, bureaucratic mumbo-jumbo."

"I think the president ought to fire the drug czar," Grassley told reporters Wednesday during a conference call.

"Marijuana obviously is a very big drug problem, particularly with the more pure marijuana that's out there now. But the mind-altering aspects of meth are just tremendous, and the change of personality that comes, and the danger of it that comes, particularly when it's domestically made."

A spokesman for Walters declined to comment.

Grassley is the chairman of the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control. According to a recent study, his state has the nation's third highest meth treatment rate behind Oregon and Hawaii.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 109th; drugczar; govwatch; grassley; johnwalters; marijuana; meth; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: ncountylee
Marijuana obviously is a very big drug problem, particularly with the more pure marijuana that's out there now.

So the more "pure" mj does what exactly? Kills people? Makes them use more? Some people are just so uninformed about basic science.

21 posted on 04/27/2006 12:07:22 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

LOL. A friend of mine smoked some "pure" mj last week, and the next day ... he went to work like he does every day.


22 posted on 04/27/2006 12:31:37 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_no_exceptions
So by their own admission, they're waging a "war" on at least 40.4% of us.

Well, sure, at some point in our lives.

Their war on me was short-lived, and ended about 20 years ago.

23 posted on 04/27/2006 12:48:11 PM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BackInBlack
Grassley isn't my favorite guy, but he's right that meth does get short shrift -- it's a lot worse than marijuana, and it's destroying a lot of lives in rural areas.

I don't think it's really a matter of meth getting less enforcement really even a matter of not being concentrated upon properly. At least as far as local law enforcement goes.

Marijuana is simply far more common than meth. However, if you don't think law enforcement realizes how bad meth use is, sit down and have a chat with some friendly officers about it.

They can tell you lots of stories how they busted someone doing something stupid and they were under the influence of or in the posession of marijuana.

The stories about meth and tweakers are much less light hearted. The stuff is highly addictive and does ugly things to those who use it. If you talk to the officers enforcing the law, you'll have little doubt that they are concentrating on leads about meth production and distribution over marijuana production and distribution.

I do know a guy who was a DEA agent for a couple years and from what he's told me it's a really screwed up agency that is always being pulled in multiple directions and having it's effectiveness undermined due to politics.

We'd be better off if the DEA was disbanded and enforcement was handled by local law enforcment in the interior, and have the border patrol, coast guard and customs to deal with the federal issue of smuggling across the border.

I think firing Grassley is pointless. It doesn't matter who holds the title, there's no way they can do the job effectively due to the political environment in which they have to operate. Just eliminate the position and cut back on a little government waste.

24 posted on 04/27/2006 12:56:09 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

Oops, I meant firing the drug Czar, not Grassley.


25 posted on 04/27/2006 12:57:00 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
So the more "pure" mj does what exactly? Kills people? Makes them use more?

Makes them giggle and eat Doritos. Off with their heads!

26 posted on 04/27/2006 1:39:10 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
These are all local issues.

In that case, we should fire the Drug Czar and not replace him. I'm all for that.

27 posted on 04/27/2006 1:40:31 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
Agree. Federal laws should be enforced by local officials.

A czar is simply a waste of funds.

28 posted on 04/27/2006 1:41:59 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
If they're local issues, why have federal laws?
29 posted on 04/27/2006 1:43:04 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights

You would trust the officials in MA to make just laws that apply to everyone?


30 posted on 04/27/2006 1:44:16 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Let MA make the laws for MA and UT make the laws for UT, and keep the feds out of it.
31 posted on 04/27/2006 1:53:42 PM PDT by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

You know the 'pure' MJ right off the plant. Most people don't even know they are smoking 15% MJ cut with 85% oregano


32 posted on 04/27/2006 2:08:11 PM PDT by bird4four4 (Behead those who suggest Islam is violent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: freepatriot32; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
34 posted on 04/27/2006 7:57:45 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/gasoline_and_government.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Yup! What you said.


35 posted on 04/27/2006 8:39:35 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
These are all local issues.

You are correct. That's why there shouldn't be a federal drug "czar" at all. Grassley is half right here. Walters should be dumped on his a$$.

36 posted on 04/28/2006 10:45:25 AM PDT by jmc813 (The best mathematical equation I have ever seen: 1 cross + 3 nails= 4 given.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen; Mojave

Thoughts?


37 posted on 04/28/2006 10:47:08 AM PDT by jmc813 (The best mathematical equation I have ever seen: 1 cross + 3 nails= 4 given.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
"We'd be better off if the DEA was disbanded and enforcement was handled by local law enforcment in the interior, and have the border patrol, coast guard and customs to deal with the federal issue of smuggling across the border."

99% of all drug arrests are made at the state or local level. The DEA is mostly involved with overseas drug interdiction and local border patrol.

38 posted on 04/28/2006 11:16:58 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Grassley's state has a bad meth problem. More federal focus on meth means more federal dollars to fund meth treatment programs in his state.


39 posted on 04/28/2006 11:19:53 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
--what is it about rural areas, I wonder?

The only way rural counties can get law enforcement money is to jump on the meth band wagon.
.
40 posted on 04/28/2006 10:29:41 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson