And these are supposed to be those anti-Semitist "Jewish stereotypes in garb, beards and Stars of David"????
So, when re-enacting history, what should be worn?
We Catholics have a right - a God given right, to celebrate our religion and traditions any way we please. Got it putz.
And if you think that's 'anti semitic', too bad.
ps;
Mr Samuels, I find the Jewish religion and its 'traditions' to be anti Christian, offensive to my beliefs, and hateful in nature. So who do I complain to, huh mr representative of the Simon Wiesenthal Center?
pps: I got your anti semitic right 'here'
ppss: Go p*$$ up a rope.
This is hugh and series.
I'm totally serial.
I told you that the Cross is offensive to many!
I'm not sure what's going on here. The article doesn't really give enough information.
On the face of it, a simple "Passion Play" shouldn't in itself be considered anti-Semitic.
If Weisenthal feels for some reason this particular "Passion Play" is in itself anti-Semitic for some special reason, he needs to elaborate on it.
In the not too distant past, "Passion Plays" in Europe were frequently followed by riots against Jews, whipped up by fanatic "Christians" who really were just a few generations past howling pagan barabarism.
In the big picture, Judaism is a parent religion to Christianity, Christ was Jewish, and both Jews and Christians are objects of attack by the Islamic menace facing all religious beliefs in the 21st century.
NWO raises its ugly head again. "Human rights" to excuse a blatant intervention into another internal country's affairs which have nothing to do with human rights. Before 1989, it was the Soviets who dictated the vassal states' various policies. Today, it's just about any outfit in the West that has the word "Institute" or "Center" in its name. Brave New World Order.
Thank our Lord that gentle Poles and Americans are on guard and sacrificing life and limb and treasure in the middle east today so that these complaints can continue to be expressed.