Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FReeper Canteen ~ Get Cup Crazy ~ April 27, 2006
Colonel_Flagg

Posted on 04/26/2006 8:45:25 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Serving the best troops in the world - welcome to the FR Canteen!
The FR Canteen is for the enjoyment of our troops and all those who support them. Our mission is to honor those past and present who have served the nation. Welcome to all who support our troops!

Get Cup Crazy!

It’s the oldest trophy in North American professional sports and it’s also the hardest trophy to win. Four rounds spread over six weeks – sixteen playoff wins requiring total commitment, heart and desire, but the result for the winner is a year’s custody of perhaps the most recognizable trophy in sports as well.

The Stanley Cup was the gift of this gentleman:

Lord Stanley of Preston, who bought the initial Stanley Cup for about $50 in 1892. At that time, it looked like this:

Note the height of the trophy, or rather the lack of the same. The original Cup lasted until 1948 when it was redesigned. By tradition (in fact, as a condition of the original challenge competition set down by Lord Stanley), each winning team would inscribe its name on a ring added to the cup, a tradition which, since 1924, has since been expanded to inscribe the names of the members of the winning team and their organizations. The Stanley Cup is thus the only trophy in North American professional sports so inscribed. The names of eight women are also inscribed on the Cup.

But equally as impressive as the Cup is the colorful history it carries. Tradition also dictates that each member of the Cup-winning team gets to take the trophy for a day and do what he pleases with it. That has led to some great stories, which follow. For more information, check out http://www.geocities.com/szczepanczyk/stanley.html. Enjoy!

1905 Ottawa Silver Seven

Hockey was a different game at the turn of the 20th Century – no forward passing was allowed in the offensive zone, and teams, as this picture will attest, only had seven players without substitutions. But that didn’t stop hijinks with the Cup. The story goes that after the Silver Seven won the Stanley Cup, one celebrant boasted he could kick it across the frozen Rideau Canal, which links Ottawa on the Ottawa River with Kingston on Lake Ontario. In a day when the Cup was a football-sized bowl and when most hockey players also played rugby, he proceeded to drop kick it into the frozen canal. (Some sources list it as being submerged.) The partiers proceeded to party elsewhere, leaving the Cup behind. The next morning, the players realized that the Cup was still at the Canal, and thankfully found it.

1907 Montreal Wanderers

Not to be outdone by the Silver Seven, the Wanderers added to Cup lore a few years later. The club reportedly wanted its picture taken with the Cup in the studio of photographer Jimmy Rice. After taking the photo, the team left – without the Cup. It stayed in the studio for some months until Rice's mother (some sources say it was his wife or his housekeeper or his cleaning lady) used it as a vase, as it held red geraniums in the Studio window.

1924 Montreal Canadiens

After winning in 1924, the Canadiens took the Cup to the home of their owner, Leo Dandurand, for a party. Naturally, hilarity ensued when the car carrying the Cup had a tire blowout. And equally naturally, the Cup was left behind on the roadside after the tire was fixed. Thankfully, it too was found where it was left. You’d think that the trophy would be easy to remember. Or, perhaps not.

1927 Ottawa Senators

King Clancy was a great defenseman of the 1920s. He was so great, in fact, that the Senators left the trophy in his living room for most of the 1927 off-season. There it served as a holder for letters, bills, chewing gum and cigar butts. Nothing like a useful piece of furniture.

1940 New York Rangers

The most famous instance of Cup misplay. In 1940, the mortgage on the then-new Madison Square Garden was paid off. The management publicly celebrated by burning the mortgage in the Cup. Some fans claimed that this act "desecrated" the Cup, leading to the alleged Curse of 1940. The Rangers waited 54 years for their next triumph.

1947 Toronto Maple Leafs

Legendary coach Conn Smythe was pretty sure of his Maple Leafs in 1947. Leading Montreal three games to two in the finals, Smythe left the Cup in Montreal knowing that it would be there to celebrate a Game Seven win for his Leafs. However, the Leafs won Game Six in Toronto, taking the series 4-2. When the time came to hoist the Cup – well, it was in Montreal. Oops. The NHL’s playoff MVP trophy is now named for Smythe – it’s a good thing the award has nothing to do with prognostication.

Late 1960s and early 1970s – No One

This is the Hockey Hall of Fame in Toronto, and our story of Cup miscues continues here. For it was from this building that the Stanley Cup was stolen, twice, in the late 1960s and early 70s along with the Conn Smythe Trophy and the Bill Masterton Trophy, presented each year for perseverance and dedication to hockey. Thankfully, even though no trophy is given for dedication to police work, all three trophes were recovered on both occasions.

1980 – New York Islanders

Meet Clark Gillies, one of the better forwards of the 1980s. His highly publicized visit with the Cup after the Isles’ first of four straight wins in 1980 featured Gillies letting his dog eat from the bowl. Good dog. Teammate Bryan Trottier, on the other hand, chose to sleep with the Cup to make sure it wasn’t a dream. Trottier would go on to win seven Stanley Cup rings – six as a player and one as an assistant coach.

1986 – Montreal Canadiens

Montreal Canadiens wing Chris Nilan was known primarily for the expert way he accumulated penalty minutes during his NHL career. Renowned (or reviled) as one of the league’s great pugilists, he achieved fame after Montreal’s 1986 win by photographing the Cup with his infant son sitting in the bowl. One would hope that Gillies had cleaned out the dog food first.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Free Republic
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 501-519 next last
To: tomkow6

OK, network printers/scanners work much better than shared. Shared printers are nothing but a headache. :-)


341 posted on 04/27/2006 9:27:02 AM PDT by El Gran Salseron (The FR Canteen's Resident Equal Opportunity Male Chauvinist Pig! :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; All
 
 Thanks to Scott for this eye-opener...

Here is a post from Raymond S.  Kraft, a California lawyer, which gives us a glimpse of the "Big Picture".... perhaps something all Americans need to read!

A California Lawyer's Perspective on Iraq, War.

Sixty-three years ago, Nazi Germany had overrun almost all of Europe and hammered England to the verge of bankruptcy and defeat, and had sunk more than four hundred British ships in their convoys between England and America for food and war materials.

Bushido Japan had overrun most of Asia, beginning in 1928, killing millions of civilians throughout China, and impressing millions more as slave labor.

The US was in an isolationist, pacifist, mood, and most Americans and Congress wanted nothing to do with the European war, or the Asian war.

Then along came Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and in outrage Congress unanimously declared war on Japan, and the following day on Germany, which had not attacked us. It was a dicey thing.  We had few allies.

France was not an ally, the Vichy government of France aligned with its German occupiers.  Germany was not an ally, it was an enemy, and Hitler intended to set up a Thousand Year Reich in EuropeJapan was not an ally, it was intent on owning and controlling all of Asia.  Japan and Germany had long-term ideas of invading Canada and Mexico, and then the United States over the north and south borders, after they had settled control of Asia and Europe.

America's allies then were England, Ireland, Scotland, Canada, Australia, and Russia, and that was about it.  There were no other countries of any size or military significance with the will and ability to contribute much or anything to the effort to defeat Hitler's Germany and Japan, and prevent the global dominance of Nazism.  And we had to send millions of tons of arms, munitions, and war supplies to Russia, England, and the Canadians, Aussies, Irish, and Scots, because none of them could produce all they needed for themselves.

All of Europe, from Norway to Italy, except Russia in the east, was already under the Nazi heel.

America was not prepared for war.  America had stood down most of its military after WWI and throughout the depression, at the outbreak of WWII there were army units training with broomsticks over their shoulders because they didn't have guns, and cars with "tank" painted on the doors because they didn't have tanks.  And a big chunk of our navy had just been sunk and damaged at Pearl Harbor.

Britain had already gone bankrupt, saved only by the donation of $600 million in gold bullion in the Bank of England that was the property of Belgium and was given by Belgium to England to carry on the war when Belgium was overrun by Hitler - actually, Belgium surrendered one day, because it was unable to oppose the German invasion, and the Germans bombed Brussels into rubble the next day anyway just to prove they could. Britain had been holding out for two years already in the face of staggering shipping loses and the near-decimation of its air force in the Battle of Britain, and was saved from being overrun by Germany only because Hitler made the mistake of thinking the Brits were a relatively minor threat that could be dealt with later and turning his attention to Russia, at a time when England was on the verge of collapse in the late summer of 1940.

Russia may have saved America's butt by putting up a desperate fight for two years until the US got geared up to begin hammering away at Germany.

Russia lost something like 24 million people in the sieges of Stalingrad and Moscow, 90% of them from cold and starvation, mostly civilians, but also more than a million soldiers.  More than a million.

Had Russia surrendered, then, Hitler would have been able to focus his entire campaign against the Brits, then America, and the Nazis would have won that war.

Had Hitler not made that mistake and invaded England in 1940 or 1941, instead, there would have been no England for the US and the Brits to use as a staging ground to prepare an assault on Nazi Europe, England would not have been able to run its North African campaign to help take a little pressure off Russia while America geared up for battle, and today Europe would very probably be run by the Nazis, the Third Reich, and, isolated and without any allies (not even the Brits), the US would very probably have had to cede Asia to the Japanese, who were basically Nazis by another name then, and the world we live in today would be very different and much worse.  I say this to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things.  And we are at another one.

There is a very dangerous minority in Islam that either has, or wants and may soon have, the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, almost anywhere in the world, unless they are prevented from doing so.

France, Germany, and Russia, have been selling them weapons technology at least as recently as 2002, as have North Korea, Syria, and Pakistan, paid for with billions of dollars Saddam Hussein skimmed from the "Oil For Food" program administered by the UN with the complicity of Kofi Annan and his son.

The Jihadis, the militant Muslims, are basically Nazis in Kaffiyahs - they believe that Islam, a radically conservative (definitely not liberal!) form of Wahhabi Islam, should own and control the Middle East first, then Europe, then the world, and that all who do not bow to Allah should be killed, enslaved, or subjugated.  They want to finish the Holocaust, destroy Israel, purge the world of Jews.  This is what they say.

There is also a civil war raging in the Middle East - for the most part not a hot war, but a war of ideas.  Islam is having its Inquisition and its Reformation today, but it is not yet known which will win - the Inquisition, or the Reformation.

If the Inquisition wins, then the Wahhabis, the Jihadis, will control the Middle East, and the OPEC oil, and the US, European, and Asian economies, the techno-industrial economies, will be at the mercy of OPEC - not an OPEC dominated by the well-educated and rational Saudis of today, but an OPEC dominated by the Jihadis.

You want gas in your car?  You want heating oil next winter?  You want jobs?  You want the dollar to be worth anything?  You better hope the Jihad, the Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the Islamic Reformation wins.

If the Reformation movement wins, that is, the moderate Muslims who believe that Islam can respect and tolerate other religions, and live in peace with the rest of the world, and move out of the 10th century into the 21st, then the troubles in the Middle East will eventually fade away, and a moderate and prosperous Middle East will emerge.

We have to help the Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the Inquisition, i.e., the Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, Al Qaeda, the Islamic terrorist movements.  We have to do it somewhere.  We cannot do it nowhere.  And we cannot do it everywhere at once.  We have created a focal point for the battle now at the time and place of our choosing, in Iraq.

Not in New York, not in London, or Paris, or Berlin, but in Iraq, where we did and are doing two very important things.

(1) We deposed Saddam Hussein.  Whether Saddam Hussein was directly involved in 9/11 or not, it is undisputed that Saddam has been actively supporting the terrorist movement for decades.  Saddam is a terrorist.

Saddam is, or was, a weapon of mass destruction, who is responsible for the deaths of probably more than a million Iraqis and two million Iranians.

(2) We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash point, with Islamic terrorism in Iraq.  We have focused the battle.  We are killing bad guys there and the ones we get there we won't have to get here, or anywhere else.  We also have a good shot at creating a democratic, peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of the Middle East, and an outpost for a stabilizing American military presence in the Middle East for as long as it is needed.

The Euros could have done this, but they didn't, and they won't.  We now know that rather than opposing the rise of the Jihad, the French, Germans, and Russians were selling them arms - we have found more than a million tons of weapons and munitions in Iraq.  If Iraq was not a threat to anyone, why did Saddam need a million tons of weapons?

And Iraq was paying for French, German, and Russian arms with money skimmed from the UN Oil For Food Program (supervised by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and his son) that was supposed to pay for food, medicine, and education, for Iraqi children.

World War II, the war with the German and Japanese Nazis, really began with a "whimper" in 1928.  It did not begin with Pearl Harbor.  It began with the Japanese invasion of China.  It was a war for fourteen years before America joined it.  It officially ended in 1945 - a 17 year war - and was followed by another decade of US occupation in Germany and Japan to get those countries reconstructed and running on their own again ..  a 27 year war.

World War II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a full year's GDP - adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion dollars, WWII cost America more than 400,000 killed in action, and nearly 100,000 still missing in action.

[The Iraq war has, so far, cost the US about $160 billion, which is roughly what 9/11 cost New York.  It has also cost about 2,200 American lives, which is roughly 1/2 of the 3,000 lives that the Jihad snuffed on 9/11.] But the cost of not fighting and winning WWII would have been unimaginably greater - a world now dominated by German and Japanese Nazism.

Americans have a short attention span, now, conditioned I suppose by 60 minute TV shows and 2-hour movies in which everything comes out okay.

The real world is not like that.  It is messy, uncertain, and sometimes bloody and ugly.  Always has been, and probably always will be.

If we do this thing in Iraq successfully, it is probable that the Reformation will ultimately prevail.  Many Muslims in the Middle East hope it will.  We will be there to support it.  It has begun in some countries, Libya, for instance.  And Dubai.  And Saudi Arabia.  If we fail, the Inquisition will probably prevail, and terrorism from Islam will be with us for all the foreseeable future, because the Inquisition, or Jihad, believes they are called by Allah to kill all the Infidels, and that death in Jihad is glorious.

The bottom line here is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism until we defeat it, whenever that is.  It will not go away on its own.  It will not go away if we ignore it.

If the US can create a reasonably democratic and stable Iraq, then we have an "England" in the Middle East, a platform, from which we can work to help modernize and moderate the Middle East.  The history of the world is the clash between the forces of relative civility and civilization, and the barbarians clamoring at the gates.  The Iraq war is merely another battle in this ancient and never-ending war.  And now, for the first time ever, the barbarians are about to get nuclear weapons.  Unless we prevent them.  Or somebody does.

The Iraq war is expensive, and uncertain, yes.  But the consequences of not fighting it and winning it will be horrifically greater.  We have four options -

1.  We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets nuclear weapons.

2.  We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets nuclear weapons (which may be as early as next year, if Iran's progress on nuclear weapons is what Iran claims it is).

3.  We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East, now, in Europe in the next few years or decades, and ultimately in America.

4.  Or we can stand down now, and pick up the fight later when the Jihad is more widespread and better armed, perhaps after the Jihad has dominated France and Germany and maybe most of the rest of Europe.  It will be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier then.

Yes, the Jihadis say that they look forward to an Islamic America.  If you oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, may live in an Islamic America under the Mullahs and the Sharia, an America that resembles Iran today.

We can be defeatist peace-activists as anti-war types seem to be, and concede, surrender, to the Jihad, or we can do whatever it takes to win this war against them.

The history of the world is the history of civilization clashes, cultural clashes.  All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win.  The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.

In the 20th century, it was Western democracy vs.  communism, and before that Western democracy vs.  Nazism, and before that Western democracy vs. German Imperialism.  Western democracy won, three times, but it wasn't cheap, fun, nice, easy, or quick.  Indeed, the wars against German Imperialism (WWI), Nazi Imperialism (WWII), and communist imperialism (the 40-year Cold War that included the Vietnam Battle, commonly called the Vietnam War, but itself a major battle in a larger war) covered almost the entire century.

The first major war of the 21st Century is the war between Western Judeo/Christian Civilization and Wahhabi Islam.  It may last a few more years, or most of this century.  It will last until the Wahhabi branch of Islam fades away, or gives up its ambitions for regional and global dominance and Jihad, or until Western Civilization gives in to the Jihad.

Senator John Kerry, in the debates and almost daily, makes 3 scary claims:

1.  We went to Iraq without enough troops.

We went with the troops the US military wanted.  We went with the troop levels General Tommy Franks asked for.  We deposed Saddam in 30 days with light casualties, much lighter than we expected.

The real problem in Iraq is that we are trying to be nice - we are trying to fight minority of the population that is Jihadis, and trying to avoid killing the large majority that is not.  We could flatten Fallujah in minutes with a flight of B52s, or seconds with one nuclear cruise missile - but we don't.  We're trying to do brain surgery, not amputate the patient's head.  The Jihadis amputate heads.

2.  We went to Iraq with too little planning.

This is a specious argument.  It supposes that if we had just had "the right plan" the war would have been easy, cheap, quick, and clean.

That is not an option.  It is a guerrilla war against a determined enemy, and no such war ever has been or ever will be easy, cheap, quick, and clean.  This is not TV.

3.  We proved ourselves incapable of governing and providing security.

This too is a specious argument.  It was never our intention to govern and provide security.  It was our intention from the beginning to do just enough to enable the Iraqis to develop a representative government and their own military and police forces to provide their own security, and that is happening.  The USand the Brits and other countries there have trained over 100,000 Iraqi police and military, now, and will have trained more than 200,000 by the end of next year.  We are in the process of transitioning operational control for security back to Iraq.

It will take time.  It will not go with no hitches.  This is not TV.

Remember, perspective is everything, and America's schools teach too little history for perspective to be clear, especially in the young American mind.

The Cold war lasted from about 1947 at least until the Berlin Wall came down in 1989.  Forty-two years.  Europe spent the first half of the 19th century fighting Napoleon, and from 1870 to 1945 fighting Germany.

World War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a ten year occupation, and the US still has troops in Germany and Japan.  World War II resulted in the death of more than 50 million people, maybe more than 100 million people, depending on which estimates you accept.

The US has taken a little more than 2,000 KIA in Iraq.  The US took more than 4,000 Killed in action on the morning of June 6, 1944, the first day of the Normandy Invasion to rid Europe of Nazi Imperialism.  In WWII the US averaged 2,000 KIA a week for four years.  Most of the individual battles of WWII lost more Americans than the entire Iraq war has done so far.

But the stakes are at least as high .  .    a world dominated by representative governments with civil rights, human rights, and personal freedoms .  or a world dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi movement, by the Jihad, under the Mullahs and the Sharia (Islamic law).

I do not understand why the American Left does not grasp this.  They favor human rights, civil rights, liberty and freedom, but evidently not for Iraqis.  In America, absolutely, but nowhere else.

300,000 Iraqi bodies in mass graves in Iraq are not our problem.  The US population is about twelve times that of Iraq, so let's multiply 300,000 by twelve.  What would you think if there were 3,600,000 American bodies in mass graves in America because of George Bush?  Would you hope for another country to help liberate America?

"Peace Activists" always seem to demonstrate where it's safe, in America.

Why don't we see Peace Activist demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea, in the places in the world that really need peace activism the most?

The liberal mentality is supposed to favor human rights, civil rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc., but if the Jihad wins, wherever the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc.  Americans who oppose the liberation of Iraq are coming down on the side of their own worst enemy.

If the Jihad wins, it is the death of Liberalism.  Everywhere the Jihad wins, it is the death of Liberalism.  ...And American Liberals just don't get it.
 


Raymond S.  Kraft is a writer and lawyer living in Northern California.  Please consider passing along copies of this to students in high school, college and university as it contains information about the American past that is very meaningful TODAY - - history about America that very likely is completely unknown by them (and their instructors, too).  By being denied the facts and truth of our history, they are at a decided disadvantage when it comes to reasoning and thinking through the issues of today.  They are prime targets for misinformation campaigns beamed at enlisting them in causes and beliefs that are special interest agenda driven.

 

342 posted on 04/27/2006 9:40:13 AM PDT by Seadog Bytes (OPM - The Liberal 'solution' to every societal problem. (Other People's Money))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Absolutely gorgeous flowers Mr. Tonkin. Thank you so much! And the men in the canteen! :)


343 posted on 04/27/2006 9:46:01 AM PDT by MeekMom (Praise Jesus! He has given ALL for us!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel


WestVirginiaRebel!

344 posted on 04/27/2006 10:07:37 AM PDT by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GodBlessUSA

Yes....one must pace themselves! Good morning to you Gracie! I plan on having a super day & hope the same for you! *Hugs*


345 posted on 04/27/2006 10:27:32 AM PDT by AZamericonnie (~www.ProudPatriots.org~Serving those who serve us!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag; GodBlessUSA

Love your patriotic kitties.


346 posted on 04/27/2006 11:06:03 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: All

Mini-Me: Nineteen-month-old Cash obviously takes after his dad, Johnny Bockerich of Salt Lake City.

347 posted on 04/27/2006 11:07:45 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: EsmeraldaA

Very sweet Es....hope your day is wonderful as well.


348 posted on 04/27/2006 11:08:24 AM PDT by AZamericonnie (~www.ProudPatriots.org~Serving those who serve us!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag; Radix

Junior! Now where did that youngster go? It figures that a bear tree in Barre, Mass., would have a cubbyhole

349 posted on 04/27/2006 11:09:30 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: MoJo2001; All

Putting the cart before the horsepower: A homemade car shares the street with more technically advanced models in the Kurdish city of Arbil, Iraq.

350 posted on 04/27/2006 11:11:00 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: All

En garde! Armed with a stick, a horned toad in Grimes Point, Nev., prepares for the battle of its life.

351 posted on 04/27/2006 11:13:28 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: All

Drinks are on me: A Florida panther named Debbie helps one of her two cubs belly up to the bar at McCarty's Wildlife Sanctuary in Acreage, Fla.

352 posted on 04/27/2006 11:14:48 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Kathy in Alaska

Morning


353 posted on 04/27/2006 11:17:16 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Maximus_Ridiculousness

Amazing site & slide show Maximus. Thanks to SFC Chromey for his service & to you for being a mulitary wife.


354 posted on 04/27/2006 11:17:35 AM PDT by AZamericonnie (~www.ProudPatriots.org~Serving those who serve us!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: All

RUMSFELD VISITS IRAQ — U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Charles Gable (left), 447th Air Expeditionary Group command post controller, greets Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld at Sather Air Base, Iraq, April 27, 2006. Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with Iraqi government officials in Baghdad. U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Will Ackerman

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld meets the airmen assigned to the 447th Air Expeditionary Group at Sather Air Base, Iraq, April 27, 2006. He and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with Iraqi government officials in Baghdad. U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Will Ackerman

355 posted on 04/27/2006 11:18:01 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: All

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld greets Sgt. Anthony Buckingham, U.K. Royal Air Force, at Sather Air Base, Iraq, April 27, 2006. Secretary Rumsfeld was leaving Iraq after meeting with Iraqi government officials in Baghdad. U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Will Ackerman

Col. Dennis Ployer, 447th Air Expeditionary Group commander, greets Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at Sather Air Base, Iraq, April 27, 2006. She and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld met with Iraqi government officials in Baghdad. U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Will Ackerman

356 posted on 04/27/2006 11:19:56 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Morning, Sand...dining time?


357 posted on 04/27/2006 11:20:43 AM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation Easter and Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Kathy in Alaska

Hi, Ex-Ma!


358 posted on 04/27/2006 11:21:01 AM PDT by tomkow6 (....coming this FRIDAY...to a Canteen near you...........Camp Run-A-Muk.....CIRCUS!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Kathy in Alaska

Yep! Just finishing up now.


359 posted on 04/27/2006 11:27:25 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: AZamericonnie
Hello Connie! Do you have a few minutes to kill zombies? LOL!
360 posted on 04/27/2006 11:32:28 AM PDT by EsmeraldaA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 501-519 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson