And you are missing *my* point entirely. Based on what you just posted, he should also be denying the same procedure to straight, married people. You've just basically condemned thousands of straight families who conceived children in his manner. Your argument is better based on the homosexual aspect.
my argument is based on the same religious beliefs as the docto. i am not attempting to have you adopt them, but clearly you appear unwilling or unable to comprehend them. i see no point to continue this. as i said previously, Catholics do NOT condone artificial insemination period. so, if you don't LIKE that argument and prefer the homosexual one, then so be it. i am telling you what the Catholic Church believes, and attempting to explain the religious beliefs upon which this physician refused to perform the procedure.
No, she said that Catholics consider this to be an artificial means of creating life and thus a devout Catholic doctor would refuse to perform this procedure based on his/her religious beliefs. That is not at all the same as condemning anyone who has used the procedure for conceiving their children. Do you comprehend the difference?