To: kinoxi
add this to the 'theoretical bs ping' And your personal expertise to back up that asinine statement is...?
Or, do you base your remark on a "stuck on stupid" misinterpretation of Genesis?
19 posted on
04/26/2006 9:11:53 AM PDT by
TXnMA
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Repeat San Jacinto!)
To: TXnMA
If in fact they are able to determine the efficiency of matter to energy transition... Could they not now be able to determine with some degree of accuracy what size the true elemental building block of matter truly is?
20 posted on
04/26/2006 4:53:26 PM PDT by
yankeedame
("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
To: TXnMA
no expertise, yours is? if you've got a functional model of gravity at the 'event horizon' let me know, it would be an honor to talk to the next Nobel recipient. 10 dimensional string theory (or it's postulate 11 dimensional M theory) are all theoretical bs at this point. Please prove me wrong and win your place in history.
23 posted on
04/28/2006 1:50:43 AM PDT by
kinoxi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson