Posted on 04/25/2006 7:36:56 PM PDT by SUSSA
HAWLEY, PA (April 25, 2006) – 9/11 Families for a Secure America member Peter Gadiel, along with other families who lost loved ones to murders committed by illegal aliens, held a rally at the White House Monday to deliver over 570,000 petition signatures to demand that President Bush enforce immigration laws. Gadiel, who lost his son, Jason Gadiel, on 9/11 in the north tower of the World Trade Center, 103rd floor, made the following statement:
“Families of Americans murdered by illegal aliens held a rally outside the White House on Monday, April 24th, to demand that the president start enforcing immigration law. Also present were Roy Beck and staff members of Numbers USA who had collected over 570,000 signatures on petitions to the president asking him to enforce US immigration law and stop the invasion of illegal aliens.
“We attempted to deliver these petitions to the White House, and after the Secret Service contacted Administration officials, the message was relayed to us that Mr. Bush's minions would not accept them.
“It was not particularly surprising to us, given the president's longstanding policy of refusal to enforce the law; his disregard for the security of the nation and the contempt he has shown for those of us who have seen our loved ones murdered by illegals, or raped, shot or otherwise victimized.
“Nevertheless, each additional refusal by this man who professes a belief in God and has sworn an oath on the Bible to ‘preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, so help me God,’ is a further reminder that this president is little different from his discredited predecessor, Bill Clinton.
“The foundation for the 9/11 attacks was prepared by al Qaeda during the Clinton Administration and principal responsibility for America's failure to prevent the attacks lies with Clinton, Albright, Reno and Jaime Gorelick. However, Mr. Bush's refusal to take even minimal action to stop the foreign invasion that has continued during the five and a half years of his term shows that he has as little concern for the security of Americans as Clinton. When there is another terrorist attack, Bush will have to accept full responsibility.
“We were informed later in the day that Mr. Bush had spoken in Orange County, California and that Republican Representative Dana Rohrabacher refused to speak on the same program with him, saying that the president had sold out to the cheap labor lobby. We applaud Mr. Rohrabacher's integrity and good judgment.”
Call, make an appointment, and leave the media behind.
That's the right way to do it.
Still, the only thing you know how to do is call people names.
So it is official, you are an America-hating, invasion-enabling, racist LaRaza parroting stooge. You didn't call it hate when your friends, the criminal invaders, waving the flags of the foreign nations to which they give their loyalty marched through the streets DEMANDING jobs, benefits, and citizenship. But when the D.C. Chapter of Free Republic joined the families of the victims of the 9/11 attacks attempted to deliver petitions pleading for better border security you call that hate.
Why don't you take your Aztlan-loving ass elsewhere where someone might appreciate your quisling comments. This forum is for Americans - conservative ones - who support America. It is not for traitors serving another flag.
Yeah, like "hate group".
"Apparently some will never get that message but most are too blinded by Bush hatred to see much of anything."
LOL...If you want to see blinded by hatred then just look at those who have taken to attacking Kristinn because he even dared to post on this thread. Now that is hatred.
Right! And the quislings never called it "hate" when the invaders marched in our streets, organized by various Marxist groups, and DEMANDED jobs, benefits, and free citizenship. Yet they have the unmitigated gall to call it "hate" when some 9/11 families and the D.C. Chapter of Free Republic tried to deliver a petition pleading for better security on our borders. They have SOOO exposed themselves and their agendas with this one.
I win-you lose.
They call it hate and evoke images of soviet-occupied Germany when border security advocates call for a wall or better fence along our borders. Is it hate when they put a fence around their own property? Is it Berlin-wall like when the U.S. border builds walls and barriers in foreign countries like Iraq and Bosnia? No, they don't call it that because it doesn't serve their agenda.
They call it hate when people call for the actual enforcement of our immigration laws to include the interdiction and deportation of illegal aliens (yes, that is the prescribed penalty under our laws for being here illegally) but they don't call it hate when other nations (like Mexico) not only enforce their immigration laws and deport those there illegally, but even shoot some of the aliens in their country. They don't because it doesn't serve their agenda.
Their agenda is NOT the security of the United States. Their agends is NOT to put Americans first for jobs, fair wages, etc. Their agenda does NOT serve America but some other master.
Did I call your group a "hate group" first? I don't remember that. I do remember you calling the D.C. Chapter of Free Republic a hate group first. So, you call someone a name - you dish it out - but when you get blasted back you start crying like a baby about name calling.
Now, tell my why you never called "hate" when the Marxist-organized invaders were marching in our streets chanting "Viva LaRaza", "Gringos out of Aztlan!" and demanding free citizenship, jobs, and benefits. No, to you and your quisling comrades, the only "hate" you see is when Americans stand up and plead for our laws to be upheld, our borders to be secured and respected, our sovereignty to be preserved, our heritage and traditions to be sustained, and our way of life to be protected. Why don't you take your illegal alien kneepads off and start supporting the American side for a change?
You're still calling me names. I'm still winning.
kristinn
Since Jul 31, 1998
Warlord of the D.C. Chapter of FreeRepublic.com
Free Republic awards: Significant FReeper (1999); Chapter of the Year (1999); FReeper of the Year (2000)-shared with Angelwood, the Ringleader of the D.C. Chapter; Lifetime Achievement (2000)-D.C. Chapter; Chapter of the Year (2001)-D.C. Chapter
You should tone it down a bit...Ben.
sw
Do you think that Bush is responsible for the death of these people?
Neither does anyone else on this board..
sw
Do you think that these protesters, Roy Beck/Numbers USA and Secure America were justified in saying that Bush was responsible for those deaths?
Please quote where that is said.
They clearly lay the blame on Clinton.
Why would they go to Bush if Clinton was responsible?
That's pretty easy to figure out. First of all President Bush is now our President and is in a better position to do something about illegal immigration than Clinton is right now. Second of all immigration laws are still not being enforced, so it is still an issue.
So, you agree, it is Bush's fault. He is to blame for these deaths.
I have not said nor do I believe the events of 9/11 are President Bush's fault. Why are you trying to put words in my mouth?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.